@article {808,
	title = {Suppression of constitutive SOS expression by recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) requires UvrD and RecX in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {73},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Jul},
	pages = {226-39},
	abstract = {Sensing DNA damage and initiation of genetic responses to repair DNA damage are critical to cell survival. In Escherichia coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced by DNA damage creating a RecA-DNA filament that interacts with the LexA repressor inducing the SOS response. RecA filament stability is negatively modulated by RecX and UvrD. recA730 (E38K) and recA4142 (F217Y) constitutively express the SOS response. recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) are intragenic suppressors of the constitutive SOS phenotype of recA730. Herein, it is shown that these suppressors are not allele specific and can suppress SOS(C) expression of recA730 and recA4142 in cis and in trans. recA4162 and recA4164 single mutants (and the recA730 and recA4142 derivatives) are Rec(+), UV(R) and are able to induce the SOS response after UV treatment like wild-type. UvrD and RecX are required for the suppression in two (recA730,4164 and recA4142,4162) of the four double mutants tested. To explain the data, one model suggests that recA(C) alleles promote SOS(C) expression by mimicking RecA filament structures that induce SOS and the suppressor alleles mimic RecA filament at end of SOS. UvrD and RecX are attracted to these latter structures to help dismantle or destabilize the RecA filament.},
	keywords = {Alleles, DNA Helicases, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Missense, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics), Substrate Specificity},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06765.x},
	author = {Long, Jarukit E and Renzette, Nicholas and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {38,
	title = {Analysis of Opi1p repressor mutants.},
	journal = {Curr Genet},
	volume = {49},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jan},
	pages = {30-8},
	abstract = {Opi1p is the only known repressor protein specific to the phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Opi1p is required for repression in response to inositol and choline supplementation. However, the mechanism of Opi1p repression is not completely understood. In part, this is because previously identified opi1 mutants contained nonsense mutations and thus provided little insight into the mechanism of Opi1p function. We have recently reported isolating novel opi1 mutants (rum and dim mutants) that contain missense mutations. Here, we show that these opi1 mutants produce Opi1p product at levels comparable to a wild-type strain. However, these mutants mis-regulate expression of two target genes, INO2-HIS3 and INO1-lacZ, and are also defective in autoregulation. An opi1-S339F mutant is particularly interesting because it completely eliminated autoregulation, but only abated regulation of an INO1-lacZ reporter. Two of the mutations in OPI1 (V343Q and S339F) provide genetic evidence for an interaction between Opi1p and the Ino2p activator since they reside in a region of Opi1p recently shown to interact with Ino2p in vitro. A third mutation (L252F) resides in a region of Opi1p with no known function.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Conserved Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Missense, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0172-8083},
	doi = {10.1007/s00294-005-0021-6},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {821,
	title = {Requirements for replication restart proteins during constitutive stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {169},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Apr},
	pages = {1799-806},
	abstract = {Constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR) is a mechanism for replisome loading in Escherichia coli K-12. This occurs in a dnaA-independent fashion in an rnhA mutant. cSDR is dependent on recA, priA, and transcription. In this report, it is shown that dnaA rnhA mutants using cSDR for initiation of their DNA replication additionally require priB, but not priC, for viability. Two subtle priA missense mutations either eliminated the ability to grow using cSDR (priA301 C479Y) or resulted in very small colonies (priA300 K230R). DnaC809, a priA suppressor, failed to allow priA or priB mutants to grow using cSDR to initiate DNA replication. Furthermore, unlike dnaC(+) strains, dnaC809 strains require priC for cSDR. DnaC809,820, a priC-independent suppressor of priA2::kan phenotypes, allowed priA and priC (but not priB) mutants to grow using cSDR to initiate DNA replication. It is also shown that rep and rnhA mutations are synthetically lethal. DnaC809 and dnaC809,820 mutations suppress this lethality. Rep is further shown to be required for cSDR in a dnaC809 strain. A model whereby these different sets of replication restart proteins interact preferentially with substrates associated with either RecA or SSB during replication restart and cSDR, respectively, is proposed.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Macromolecular Substances, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Rec A Recombinases, RNA, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	doi = {10.1534/genetics.104.036962},
	author = {Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {825,
	title = {PriA mutations that affect PriA-PriC function during replication restart.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Aug},
	pages = {697-704},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, repair and restart of collapsed replication forks is thought to be essential for cell growth. The replication restart proteins, PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaB, DnaC, DnaG, DnaT and Rep, form redundant pathways that recognize repaired replication forks and restart them. Recognition, modulation of specific DNA structures and loading of the replicative helicase by the replication restart proteins, is likely to be important for replication restart. It has been hypothesized that PriB and PriC function with PriA in genetically separate and redundant PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways. In this study, the del(priB)302 or priC303:kan mutations were used to isolate the PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways genetically so that the effects of three priA missense mutations, priA300 (K230R), priA301 (C479Y) and priA306 (L557P), on these pathways could be assessed. In a wild-type background, the three priA mutations had little, if any, effect on the phenotypes of UV resistance, basal levels of SOS expression and cell viability. In the priB mutant, priA300 and priA301 caused dramatic negative changes in the three phenotypes listed above (and others), whereas the third priA mutant allele, priA306, showed very little negative effect. In the priC mutant, all three priA mutations behaved similarly, producing little, if any, changes in phenotypes. We conclude that priA300 and priA301 mostly affect the PriA-PriC pathway and do so more than priA306. We suggest that PriA{\textquoteright}s helicase activity is important for the PriA-PriC pathway of replication restart.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage mu, Cell Division, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Lethal, Genotype, Models, Biological, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J and McCool, J D and Do, T T and Johansen, R U}
}
