@article {732,
	title = {The role of nano-scale heterogeneous electrostatic interactions in initial bacterial adhesion from flow: a case study with Staphylococcus aureus.},
	journal = {Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces},
	volume = {76},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 Apr 1},
	pages = {489-95},
	abstract = {This study investigated the initial adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus from flowing buffer onto modified albumin films with the objective of probing the influence of electrostatic heterogeneity on bacterial adhesion. Electrostatic heterogeneity, on the lengthscale of 10-100 nm, was incorporated into the protein film through the irreversible random deposition of small amounts of polycation coils to produce isolated positive "patches" on the otherwise negative albumin surface before exposure to bacteria, which also possess a net negative surface charge. The system was benchmarked against an appropriate analog using 1 microm silica spheres and the same cationic patches on a silica substrate. Bacterial adhesion from flow was measured with the surface oriented vertically to eliminate gravitational forces between the bacteria and collector. In both systems, a threshold in the surface density of polycation patches needed for bacterial (or silica particle) capture indicated multivalent binding: multiple polycation patches were needed to adhere the bacteria (particles). The shifting of the threshold to greater patch concentrations at lower ionic strengths confirmed that the electrostatic interaction area (zone of influence) was a key factor in modulating the interactions. The role of the contact area in this manner is important because it enables a quantitative explanation of counterintuitive bacterial adhesion onto net negative surfaces. The study further revealed a hydrodynamic crossover from a regime where flow aids bacterial adhesion to one where flow impedes adhesion. An explanation is put forth in terms of the relative hydrodynamic and surface forces.},
	keywords = {Adsorption, Bacterial Adhesion, Methacrylates, Nylons, Particle Size, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Silicon Dioxide, Staphylococcus aureus, Static Electricity, Surface Properties},
	issn = {1873-4367},
	doi = {10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.12.009},
	author = {Kalasin, Surachate and Dabkowski, Jeffrey and N{\"u}sslein, Klaus and Santore, Maria M}
}
@article {482,
	title = {Sustained removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater following stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction.},
	journal = {Environ Sci Technol},
	volume = {42},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Apr 15},
	pages = {2999-3004},
	abstract = {Previous field studies on in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater in an aquifer in Rifle, Colorado identified two distinct phases following the addition of acetate to stimulate microbial respiration. In phase I, Geobacter species are the predominant organisms, Fe(III) is reduced, and microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) removes uranium from the groundwater. In phase II, Fe(III) is depleted, sulfate is reduced, and sulfate-reducing bacteria predominate. Long-term monitoring revealed an unexpected third phase during which U(VI) removal continues even after acetate additions are stopped. All three of these phases were successfully reproduced in flow-through sediment columns. When sediments from the third phase were heat sterilized, the capacity for U(VI) removal was lost. In the live sediments U(VI) removed from the groundwater was recovered as U(VI) in the sediments. This contrasts to the recovery of U(IV) in sediments resulting from the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) during the Fe(III) reduction phase in acetate-amended sediments. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences in the sediments in which U(VI) was being adsorbed indicated that members of the Firmicutes were the predominant organisms whereas no Firmicutes sequences were detected in background sediments which did not have the capacity to sorb U(VI), suggesting that the U(VI) adsorption might be due to the presence of these living organisms or at least their intact cell components. This unexpected enhanced adsorption of U(VI) onto sediments following the stimulation of microbial growth in the subsurface may potentially enhance the cost effectiveness of in situ uranium bioremediation.},
	keywords = {Acetates, Adsorption, Bacteria, Colorado, Geologic Sediments, Oxidation-Reduction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sulfates, Uranium, Water Pollutants, Radioactive, Water Supply},
	issn = {0013-936X},
	author = {N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Vrionis, Helen A and Resch, Charles T and Long, Philip E and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {629,
	title = {Bioremediation of metal contamination.},
	journal = {Curr Opin Biotechnol},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1997},
	month = {1997 Jun},
	pages = {285-9},
	abstract = {Recent studies have demonstrated that microbes might be used to remediate metal contamination by removing metals from contaminated water or waste streams, sequestering metals in soils and sediments or solubilizing metals to aid in their extraction. This is primarily accomplished either by biosorption of metals or enzymatically catalyzed changes in the metal redox state. Bioremediation of metals is still primarily a research problem with little large-scale application of this technology.},
	keywords = {Adsorption, Bacteria, Biomass, Biotechnology, Environmental Pollutants, Metals, Oxidation-Reduction},
	issn = {0958-1669},
	author = {Lovley, D R and Coates, J D}
}
