@article {819,
	title = {A novel dnaC mutation that suppresses priB rep mutant phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {60},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 May},
	pages = {973-83},
	abstract = {The loading of a replisome in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells at an origin of DNA replication and during replication restart is a highly ordered and regulated process. During replication restart in Escherichia coli, the PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaT and Rep proteins form multiple pathways that bind to repaired replication forks. These complexes are then recognized by DnaC as sites to load DnaB, the replicative helicase. Several dnaC mutations have been isolated that suppress phenotypes of some replication restart mutants. A new dnaC mutation (dnaC824) is reported here that efficiently suppresses priB rep mutant phenotypes. Furthermore, it is shown that dnaC824 will suppress phenotypes of priB priA300, rep priA300 and priB priC strains. Unlike other dnaC suppressors, it can only weakly suppress the absence of priA. Others have reported a different type of dnaC mutation, dnaC1331, is able to mimic priB mutant phenotypes. This is supported herein by showing that like dnaC1331, a priB mutation is synthetically lethal with a dam mutation and this can be rescued by a mutH mutation. Furthermore, priB dam lethality can also be suppressed by dnaC824. Like a priB mutation, a dnaC1331 mutation causes a priA2::kan-like phenotype when combined with priA300. Lastly, we show that dnaC824 is dominant to wild type and that dnaC1331 is recessive to wild type. Several models are discussed for the action of these mutant dnaC proteins in replication restart.},
	keywords = {DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Dominant, Genes, Lethal, Genes, Recessive, Mutant Proteins, Mutation, Phenotype, Suppression, Genetic},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05147.x},
	author = {Boonsombat, Ruethairat and Yeh, Su-Ping and Milne, Amy and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {822,
	title = {Allele specific synthetic lethality between priC and dnaAts alleles at the permissive temperature of 30 degrees C in E. coli K-12.},
	journal = {BMC Microbiol},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {47},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: DnaA is an essential protein in the regulation and initiation of DNA replication in many bacteria. It forms a protein-DNA complex at oriC to which DnaC loads DnaB. DNA replication forks initiated at oriC by DnaA can collapse on route to the terminus for a variety of reasons. PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaT, Rep and DnaC form multiple pathways to restart repaired replication forks. DnaC809 and dnaC809,820 are suppressors of priA2::kan mutant phenotypes. The former requires PriC and Rep while the latter is independent of them. RnhA339::cat mutations allow DnaA-independent initiation of DNA replication.

RESULTS: It is shown herein that a priC303::kan mutation is synthetically lethal with either a dnaA46 or dnaA508 temperature sensitive mutation at the permissive temperature of 30 degrees C. The priC-dnaA lethality is specific for the dnaA allele. The priC303::kan mutant was viable when placed in combination with either dnaA5, dnaA167, dnaA204 or dnaA602. The priC-dnaA508 and priC-dnaA46 lethality could be suppressed by rnhA339::cat. The priC-dnaA508 lethality could be suppressed by a dnaC809,820 mutation, but not dnaC809. Neither of the dnaC mutations could suppress the priC-dnaA46 lethality.

CONCLUSIONS: A hitherto unknown function for either DnaA in replication restart or PriC in initiation of DNA replication that occurs in certain dnaA temperature sensitive mutant strains at the permissive temperature of 30 degrees C has been documented. Models considering roles for PriC during initiation of DNA replication and roles for DnaA in replication restart were tested and found not to decisively explain the data. Other roles of dnaA in transcription and nucleoid structure are additionally considered.},
	keywords = {Alleles, Bacterial Proteins, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Lethal, Mutation, Temperature},
	issn = {1471-2180},
	doi = {10.1186/1471-2180-4-47},
	author = {Hinds, Tania and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {399,
	title = {A comprehensive alanine scanning mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli transcriptional activator SoxS: identifying amino acids important for DNA binding and transcription activation.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {322},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Sep 13},
	pages = {237-57},
	abstract = {SoxS is the direct transcriptional activator of the superoxide regulon. SoxS recognizes a highly degenerate "soxbox" DNA sequence, and activates transcription from class I and class II promoters. SoxS is the smallest member of the AraC/XylS family of transcription regulators whose hallmark is dual helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motifs. Evidence suggests that the N-terminal HTH motif of SoxS interacts with a highly conserved region of the soxbox termed recognition element 1 (RE1), while the C-terminal HTH motif interacts with the less conserved recognition element 2 (RE2). In the work described here, we prepared a complete library of 101 SoxS mutants containing single alanine substitutions of SoxS, and we characterized the mutant proteins in vivo and in vitro. With SoxS being closely related to MarA, we analyzed the effects of the SoxS mutations in the context of the MarA-mar crystal structure and with respect to the NMR study of MarA-DNA complexes in solution. From the properties of the alanine substitutions, we conclude the following. (1) Surface-exposed residues of helix 3 and helix 6, the recognition helices of the dual HTH motifs, are important to DNA binding and transcription activation; however, substitutions of residues predicted from the MarA-mar crystal structure to make contact with the sugar-phosphate backbone are more detrimental to DNA binding than mutations predicted to make base-specific contacts. (2) Substitution of several residues within the recognition helix predicted to make base-specific contacts with RE2 have relatively little effect on DNA-binding, suggesting the possibility of alternative protein-DNA interactions than those inferred from the MarA-mar crystal structure. (3) DNA binding and transcription activation were reduced by substitution of conserved amino acid residues comprising the hydrophobic core, presumably because they disrupt the structural integrity of SoxS. (4) Mutant K30A appears to be a positive control mutant defective in a protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase that is required for transcription activation at all SoxS-dependent promoters because it binds and bends DNA normally but fails to activate transcription from both classes of promoters. Alanine substitutions of surface-exposed residues H3, K5, D9, S31, and V45 confer a similar phenotype. Since these residues are near K30 on the surface of the protein, the surface formed by the six residues may be used to make protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase that are required for transcription activation at both class I and class II SoxS-dependent promoters. (5) Mutants F74A, D75A, M78A, D79A and Q85A appear to define a surface required for protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase specifically at class II promoters because these positive control mutants bind and bend DNA normally but are defective in activation of class II promoters but not class I promoters. These SoxS mutants that bind and bend DNA normally but are defective in transcription activation represent the first positive control mutants with putative defects in protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase among the SoxS/MarA/Rob subset of the AraC/XylS family of transcription regulators.},
	keywords = {Alanine, Amino Acid Substitution, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Lethal, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lac Operon, Models, Molecular, Mutagenesis, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phenotype, Phosphates, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Structure-Activity Relationship, Trans-Activators, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0022-2836},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {825,
	title = {PriA mutations that affect PriA-PriC function during replication restart.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Aug},
	pages = {697-704},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, repair and restart of collapsed replication forks is thought to be essential for cell growth. The replication restart proteins, PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaB, DnaC, DnaG, DnaT and Rep, form redundant pathways that recognize repaired replication forks and restart them. Recognition, modulation of specific DNA structures and loading of the replicative helicase by the replication restart proteins, is likely to be important for replication restart. It has been hypothesized that PriB and PriC function with PriA in genetically separate and redundant PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways. In this study, the del(priB)302 or priC303:kan mutations were used to isolate the PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways genetically so that the effects of three priA missense mutations, priA300 (K230R), priA301 (C479Y) and priA306 (L557P), on these pathways could be assessed. In a wild-type background, the three priA mutations had little, if any, effect on the phenotypes of UV resistance, basal levels of SOS expression and cell viability. In the priB mutant, priA300 and priA301 caused dramatic negative changes in the three phenotypes listed above (and others), whereas the third priA mutant allele, priA306, showed very little negative effect. In the priC mutant, all three priA mutations behaved similarly, producing little, if any, changes in phenotypes. We conclude that priA300 and priA301 mostly affect the PriA-PriC pathway and do so more than priA306. We suggest that PriA{\textquoteright}s helicase activity is important for the PriA-PriC pathway of replication restart.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage mu, Cell Division, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Lethal, Genotype, Models, Biological, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J and McCool, J D and Do, T T and Johansen, R U}
}
@article {827,
	title = {Multiple genetic pathways for restarting DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {155},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Jun},
	pages = {487-97},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, the primosome assembly proteins, PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaT, DnaC, DnaB, and DnaG, are thought to help to restart DNA replication forks at recombinational intermediates. Redundant functions between priB and priC and synthetic lethality between priA2::kan and rep3 mutations raise the possibility that there may be multiple pathways for restarting replication forks in vivo. Herein, it is shown that priA2::kan causes synthetic lethality when placed in combination with either Deltarep::kan or priC303:kan. These determinations were made using a nonselective P1 transduction-based viability assay. Two different priA2::kan suppressors (both dnaC alleles) were tested for their ability to rescue the priA-priC and priA-rep double mutant lethality. Only dnaC809,820 (and not dnaC809) could rescue the lethality in each case. Additionally, it was shown that the absence of the 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} helicase activity of both PriA and Rep is not the critical missing function that causes the synthetic lethality in the rep-priA double mutant. One model proposes that replication restart at recombinational intermediates occurs by both PriA-dependent and PriA-independent pathways. The PriA-dependent pathways require at least priA and priB or priC, and the PriA-independent pathway requires at least priC and rep. It is further hypothesized that the dnaC809 suppression of priA2::kan requires priC and rep, whereas dnaC809,820 suppression of priA2::kan does not.},
	keywords = {Base Sequence, DNA Primers, DNA Replication, Escherichia coli, Genes, Lethal, Mutation, Polymerase Chain Reaction},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J}
}
