@article {395,
	title = {A degenerate tripartite DNA-binding site required for activation of ComA-dependent quorum response gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {381},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Aug 29},
	pages = {261-75},
	abstract = {In Bacillus subtilis, the transcription factor ComA activates several biological processes in response to increasing population density. Extracellular peptide signaling is used to coordinate the activity of ComA with population density. At low culture densities, when the concentration of signaling peptides is lowest, ComA is largely inactive. At higher densities, when the concentration of signaling peptides is higher, ComA is active and activates the transcription of at least nine operons involved in the development of competence and in the production of degradative enzymes and antibiotics. We found that ComA binds a degenerate tripartite sequence consisting of three DNA-binding determinants or "recognition elements." Mutational analyses showed that all three recognition elements are required for transcription activation in vivo and for specific DNA binding by ComA in vitro. Degeneracy of the recognition elements in the ComA-binding site is an important regulatory feature for coordinating transcription with population density (i.e., promoters containing an optimized binding site have high activity at low culture density and are no longer regulated in the normal-density-dependent manner). We found that purified ComA forms a dimer in solution, and we propose a model for how two dimers of ComA bind to an odd number of DNA-binding determinants to activate transcription of target genes. This DNA-protein architecture for transcription activation appears to be conserved for ComA homologs in other Bacillus species.},
	keywords = {Bacillus subtilis, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Dimerization, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Peptide Synthases, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Quorum Sensing, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription, Genetic, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {1089-8638},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.035},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Grossman, Alan D}
}
@article {570,
	title = {Geobacter sulfurreducens has two autoregulated lexA genes whose products do not bind the recA promoter: differing responses of lexA and recA to DNA damage.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {185},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 Apr},
	pages = {2493-502},
	abstract = {The Escherichia coli LexA protein was used as a query sequence in TBLASTN searches to identify the lexA gene of the delta-proteobacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens from its genome sequence. The results of the search indicated that G. sulfurreducens has two independent lexA genes designated lexA1 and lexA2. A copy of a dinB gene homologue, which in E. coli encodes DNA polymerase IV, is present downstream of each lexA gene. Reverse transcription-PCR analyses demonstrated that, in both cases, lexA and dinB constitute a single transcriptional unit. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with purified LexA1 and LexA2 proteins have shown that both proteins bind the imperfect palindrome GGTTN(2)CN(4)GN(3)ACC found in the promoter region of both lexA1 and lexA2. This sequence is also present upstream of the Geobacter metallireducens lexA gene, indicating that it is the LexA box of this bacterial genus. This palindrome is not found upstream of either the G. sulfurreducens or the G. metallireducens recA genes. Furthermore, DNA damage induces expression of the lexA-dinB transcriptional unit but not that of the recA gene. However, the basal level of recA gene expression is dramatically higher than that of the lexA gene. Likewise, the promoters of the G. sulfurreducens recN, ruvAB, ssb, umuDC, uvrA, and uvrB genes do not contain the LexA box and are not likely to bind to the LexA1 or LexA2 proteins. G. sulfurreducens is the first bacterial species harboring a lexA gene for which a constitutive expression of its recA gene has been described.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Proteins, Consensus Sequence, DNA Damage, DNA Polymerase beta, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Gene Expression, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proteobacteria, Rec A Recombinases, Sequence Alignment, Serine Endopeptidases, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Jara, M{\'o}nica and N{\'u}{\~n}ez, Cinthia and Campoy, Susana and Fern{\'a}ndez de Henestrosa, Antonio R and Lovley, Derek R and Barb{\'e}, Jordi}
}
@article {399,
	title = {A comprehensive alanine scanning mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli transcriptional activator SoxS: identifying amino acids important for DNA binding and transcription activation.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {322},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Sep 13},
	pages = {237-57},
	abstract = {SoxS is the direct transcriptional activator of the superoxide regulon. SoxS recognizes a highly degenerate "soxbox" DNA sequence, and activates transcription from class I and class II promoters. SoxS is the smallest member of the AraC/XylS family of transcription regulators whose hallmark is dual helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motifs. Evidence suggests that the N-terminal HTH motif of SoxS interacts with a highly conserved region of the soxbox termed recognition element 1 (RE1), while the C-terminal HTH motif interacts with the less conserved recognition element 2 (RE2). In the work described here, we prepared a complete library of 101 SoxS mutants containing single alanine substitutions of SoxS, and we characterized the mutant proteins in vivo and in vitro. With SoxS being closely related to MarA, we analyzed the effects of the SoxS mutations in the context of the MarA-mar crystal structure and with respect to the NMR study of MarA-DNA complexes in solution. From the properties of the alanine substitutions, we conclude the following. (1) Surface-exposed residues of helix 3 and helix 6, the recognition helices of the dual HTH motifs, are important to DNA binding and transcription activation; however, substitutions of residues predicted from the MarA-mar crystal structure to make contact with the sugar-phosphate backbone are more detrimental to DNA binding than mutations predicted to make base-specific contacts. (2) Substitution of several residues within the recognition helix predicted to make base-specific contacts with RE2 have relatively little effect on DNA-binding, suggesting the possibility of alternative protein-DNA interactions than those inferred from the MarA-mar crystal structure. (3) DNA binding and transcription activation were reduced by substitution of conserved amino acid residues comprising the hydrophobic core, presumably because they disrupt the structural integrity of SoxS. (4) Mutant K30A appears to be a positive control mutant defective in a protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase that is required for transcription activation at all SoxS-dependent promoters because it binds and bends DNA normally but fails to activate transcription from both classes of promoters. Alanine substitutions of surface-exposed residues H3, K5, D9, S31, and V45 confer a similar phenotype. Since these residues are near K30 on the surface of the protein, the surface formed by the six residues may be used to make protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase that are required for transcription activation at both class I and class II SoxS-dependent promoters. (5) Mutants F74A, D75A, M78A, D79A and Q85A appear to define a surface required for protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase specifically at class II promoters because these positive control mutants bind and bend DNA normally but are defective in activation of class II promoters but not class I promoters. These SoxS mutants that bind and bend DNA normally but are defective in transcription activation represent the first positive control mutants with putative defects in protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase among the SoxS/MarA/Rob subset of the AraC/XylS family of transcription regulators.},
	keywords = {Alanine, Amino Acid Substitution, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Lethal, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lac Operon, Models, Molecular, Mutagenesis, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phenotype, Phosphates, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Structure-Activity Relationship, Trans-Activators, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0022-2836},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Wolf, Richard E}
}
