@article {1456,
	title = {Saccharomyces cerevisiae essential genes with an Opi- phenotype.},
	journal = {G3 (Bethesda)},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {2014 Apr},
	pages = {761-7},
	abstract = {<p>The overproduction and secretion of inositol (i.e., Opi(-)) phenotype is associated with defects in regulation of phospholipid biosynthesis in yeast. Here we report a screen of the essential yeast gene set using a conditional-expression library. This screen identified novel functions previously unknown to affect phospholipid synthesis.</p>
},
	keywords = {Cluster Analysis, Genes, Essential, Histone Acetyltransferases, Inositol, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins},
	issn = {2160-1836},
	doi = {10.1534/g3.113.010140},
	author = {Salas-Santiago, Bryan and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {32,
	title = {Transcription regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene by the Ino2p and Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix proteins.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {83},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Jan},
	pages = {395-407},
	abstract = {<p>The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene product accounts for a majority of the acid phosphatase activity. Its expression is induced by the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, Pho4p, in response to phosphate depletion. Pho4p binds predominantly to two UAS elements (UASp1 at -356 and UASp2 at -247) in the PHO5 promoter. Previous studies from our lab have shown cross-regulation of different biological processes by bHLH proteins. This study tested the ability of all yeast bHLH proteins to regulate PHO5 expression and identified inositol-mediated regulation via the Ino2p/Ino4p bHLH proteins. Ino2p/Ino4p are known regulators of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Genetic epistasis experiments showed that regulation by inositol required a third UAS site (UASp3 at -194). ChIP assays showed that Ino2p:Ino4p bind the PHO5 promoter and that this binding is dependent on Pho4p binding. These results demonstrate that phospholipid biosynthesis is co-ordinated with phosphate utilization via the bHLH proteins.</p>
},
	keywords = {Acid Phosphatase, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, DNA, Fungal, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Inositol, Models, Biological, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07941.x},
	author = {He, Ying and Swaminathan, Aishwarya and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {688,
	title = {Stress-induced synthesis of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in mycobacteria.},
	journal = {J Biol Chem},
	volume = {285},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 May 28},
	pages = {16643-50},
	abstract = {Phosphoinositides play key roles in regulating membrane dynamics and intracellular signaling in eukaryotic cells. However, comparable lipid-based signaling pathways have not been identified in bacteria. Here we show that Mycobacterium smegmatis and other Actinomycetes bacteria can synthesize the phosphoinositide, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P). This lipid was transiently labeled with [(3)H]inositol. Sensitivity of the purified lipid to alkaline phosphatase, headgroup analysis by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry demonstrated that it had the structure 1,2-[tuberculostearoyl, octadecenoyl]-sn-glycero 3-phosphoinositol 3-phosphate. Synthesis of PI3P was elevated by salt stress but not by exposure to high concentrations of non-ionic solutes. Synthesis of PI3P in a cell-free system was stimulated by the synthesis of CDP-diacylglycerol, a lipid substrate for phosphatidylinositol (PI) biosynthesis, suggesting that efficient cell-free PI3P synthesis is dependent on de novo PI synthesis. In vitro experiments further indicated that the rapid turnover of this lipid was mediated, at least in part, by a vanadate-sensitive phosphatase. This is the first example of de novo synthesis of PI3P in bacteria, and the transient synthesis in response to environmental stimuli suggests that some bacteria may have evolved similar lipid-mediated signaling pathways to those observed in eukaryotic cells.},
	keywords = {Cell-Free System, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Leishmania, Lipids, Mass Spectrometry, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Nucleotides, Oxalic Acid, Phosphatidylinositol Phosphates, Phosphatidylinositols, Phospholipids, Phosphorylation, Salts, Signal Transduction},
	issn = {1083-351X},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M110.119263},
	author = {Morita, Yasu S and Yamaryo-Botte, Yoshiki and Miyanagi, Kana and Callaghan, Judy M and Patterson, John H and Crellin, Paul K and Coppel, Ross L and Billman-Jacobe, Helen and Kinoshita, Taroh and McConville, Malcolm J}
}
@article {36,
	title = {Transcriptional regulation of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes.},
	journal = {Biochim Biophys Acta},
	volume = {1771},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Mar},
	pages = {310-21},
	abstract = {The last several years have been witness to significant developments in understanding transcriptional regulation of the yeast phospholipid structural genes. The response of most phospholipid structural genes to inositol is now understood on a mechanistic level. The roles of specific activators and repressors are also well established. The knowledge of specific regulatory factors that bind the promoters of phospholipid structural genes serves as a foundation for understanding the role of chromatin modification complexes. Collectively, these findings present a complex picture for transcriptional regulation of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. The INO1 gene is an ideal example of the complexity of transcriptional control and continues to serve as a model for studying transcription in general. Furthermore, transcription of the regulatory genes is also subject to complex and essential regulation. In addition, databases resulting from a plethora of genome-wide studies have identified regulatory signals that control one of the essential phospholipid biosynthetic genes, PIS1. These databases also provide significant clues for other regulatory signals that may affect phospholipid biosynthesis. Here, we have tried to present a complete summary of the transcription factors and mechanisms that regulate the phospholipid biosynthetic genes.},
	keywords = {CDP-Diacylglycerol-Inositol 3-Phosphatidyltransferase, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Intramolecular Lyases, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Phospholipids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Yeasts},
	issn = {0006-3002},
	doi = {10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.05.017},
	author = {Chen, Meng and Hancock, Leandria C and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {37,
	title = {Genomic analysis of the Opi- phenotype.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {173},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006 Jun},
	pages = {621-34},
	abstract = {Most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are coordinately regulated in response to inositol and choline. Inositol affects the intracellular levels of phosphatidic acid (PA). Opi1p is a repressor of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes and specifically binds PA in the endoplasmic reticulum. In the presence of inositol, PA levels decrease, releasing Opi1p into the nucleus where it represses transcription. The opi1 mutant overproduces and excretes inositol into the growth medium in the absence of inositol and choline (Opi(-) phenotype). To better understand the mechanism of Opi1p repression, the viable yeast deletion set was screened to identify Opi(-) mutants. In total, 89 Opi(-) mutants were identified, of which 7 were previously known to have the Opi(-) phenotype. The Opi(-) mutant collection included genes with roles in phospholipid biosynthesis, transcription, protein processing/synthesis, and protein trafficking. Included in this set were all nonessential components of the NuA4 HAT complex and six proteins in the Rpd3p-Sin3p HDAC complex. It has previously been shown that defects in phosphatidylcholine synthesis (cho2 and opi3) yield the Opi(-) phenotype because of a buildup of PA. However, in this case the Opi(-) phenotype is conditional because PA can be shuttled through a salvage pathway (Kennedy pathway) by adding choline to the growth medium. Seven new mutants present in the Opi(-) collection (fun26, kex1, nup84, tps1, mrpl38, mrpl49, and opi10/yol032w) were also suppressed by choline, suggesting that these affect PC synthesis. Regulation in response to inositol is also coordinated with the unfolded protein response (UPR). Consistent with this, several Opi(-) mutants were found to affect the UPR (yhi9, ede1, and vps74).},
	keywords = {Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Fungal, Genes, Reporter, Genome, Fungal, Genomics, Inositol, Lac Operon, Models, Biological, Mutation, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Protein Folding, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	doi = {10.1534/genetics.106.057489},
	author = {Hancock, Leandria C and Behta, Ryan P and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {696,
	title = {Compartmentalization of lipid biosynthesis in mycobacteria.},
	journal = {J Biol Chem},
	volume = {280},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Jun 3},
	pages = {21645-52},
	abstract = {The plasma membrane of Mycobacterium sp. is the site of synthesis of several distinct classes of lipids that are either retained in the membrane or exported to the overlying cell envelope. Here, we provide evidence that enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of two major lipid classes, the phosphatidylinositol mannosides (PIMs) and aminophospholipids, are compartmentalized within the plasma membrane. Enzymes involved in the synthesis of early PIM intermediates were localized to a membrane subdomain termed PMf, that was clearly resolved from the cell wall by isopyknic density centrifugation and amplified in rapidly dividing Mycobacterium smegmatis. In contrast, the major pool of apolar PIMs and enzymes involved in polar PIM biosynthesis were localized to a denser fraction that contained both plasma membrane and cell wall markers (PM-CW). Based on the resistance of the PIMs to solvent extraction in live but not lysed cells, we propose that polar PIM biosynthesis occurs in the plasma membrane rather than the cell wall component of the PM-CW. Enzymes involved in phosphatidylethanolamine biosynthesis also displayed a highly polarized distribution between the PMf and PM-CW fractions. The PMf was greatly reduced in non-dividing cells, concomitant with a reduction in the synthesis and steady-state levels of PIMs and amino-phospholipids and the redistribution of PMf marker enzymes to non-PM-CW fractions. The formation of the PMf and recruitment of enzymes to this domain may thus play a role in regulating growth-specific changes in the biosynthesis of membrane and cell wall lipids.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biochemistry, Cell Membrane, Cell Wall, Hemagglutinins, Lipid Metabolism, Lipids, Mannosides, Mannosyltransferases, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Biological, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Phosphatidylethanolamines, Phosphatidylinositols, Phospholipids, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Subcellular Fractions},
	issn = {0021-9258},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M414181200},
	author = {Morita, Yasu S and Velasquez, Ren{\'e} and Taig, Ellen and Waller, Ross F and Patterson, John H and Tull, Dedreia and Williams, Spencer J and Billman-Jacobe, Helen and McConville, Malcolm J}
}
@article {40,
	title = {Genomic analysis of PIS1 gene expression.},
	journal = {Eukaryot Cell},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Mar},
	pages = {604-14},
	abstract = {The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PIS1 gene is essential and required for the final step in the de novo synthesis of phosphatidylinositol. Transcription of the PIS1 gene is uncoupled from the factors that regulate other yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes are regulated in response to inositol and choline via a regulatory circuit that includes the Ino2p:Ino4p activator complex and the Opi1p repressor. PIS1 is regulated in response to carbon source and anaerobic growth conditions. Both of these regulatory responses are modest, which is not entirely surprising since PIS1 is essential. However, even modest regulation of PIS1 expression has been shown to affect phosphatidylinositol metabolism and to affect cell cycle progression. This prompted the present study, which employed a genomic screen, database mining, and more traditional promoter analysis to identify genes that affect PIS1 expression. A screen of the viable yeast deletion set identified 120 genes that affect expression of a PIS1-lacZ reporter. The gene set included several peroxisomal genes, silencing genes, and transcription factors. Factors suggested by database mining, such as Pho2 and Yfl044c, were also found to affect PIS1-lacZ expression. A PIS1 promoter deletion study identified an upstream regulatory sequence element that was required for carbon source regulation located downstream of three previously defined upstream activation sequence elements. Collectively, these studies demonstrate how a collection of genomic and traditional strategies can be implemented to identify a set of genes that affect the regulation of an essential gene.},
	keywords = {Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Silencing, Genome, Fungal, Glycerol, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Peroxisomes, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transferases (Other Substituted Phosphate Groups)},
	issn = {1535-9778},
	doi = {10.1128/EC.4.3.604-614.2005},
	author = {Gardocki, Mary E and Bakewell, Margaret and Kamath, Deepa and Robinson, Kelly and Borovicka, Kathy and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {42,
	title = {Expression of the yeast PIS1 gene requires multiple regulatory elements including a Rox1p binding site.},
	journal = {J Biol Chem},
	volume = {278},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 Oct 3},
	pages = {38646-52},
	abstract = {The PIS1 gene is required for de novo synthesis of phosphatidylinositol (PI), an essential phospholipid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PIS1 gene expression is unusual because it is uncoupled from the other phospholipid biosynthetic genes, which are regulated in response to inositol and choline. Relatively little is known about regulation of transcription of the PIS1 gene. We reported previously that PIS1 transcription is sensitive to carbon source. To further our understanding of the regulation of PIS1 transcription, we carried out a promoter deletion analysis that identified three regions required for PIS1 gene expression (upstream activating sequence (UAS) elements 1-3). Deletion of either UAS1 or UAS2 resulted in an approximately 45\% reduction in expression, whereas removal of UAS3 yielded an 84\% decrease in expression. A comparison of promoters among several Saccharomyces species shows that these sequences are highly conserved. Curiously, the UAS3 element region (-149 to -138) includes a Rox1p binding site. Rox1p is a repressor of hypoxic genes under aerobic growth conditions. Consistent with this, we have found that expression of a PIS1-cat reporter was repressed under aerobic conditions, and this repression was dependent on both Rox1p and its binding site. Furthermore, PI levels were elevated under anaerobic conditions. This is the first evidence that PI levels are affected by regulation of PIS1 transcription.},
	keywords = {Anoxia, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Carbon, Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase, Choline, Chromatography, Thin Layer, Conserved Sequence, DNA, DNA, Complementary, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Deletion, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Reporter, Inositol, Lipid Metabolism, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxygen, Phospholipids, Plasmids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Transferases (Other Substituted Phosphate Groups)},
	issn = {0021-9258},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M305251200},
	author = {Gardocki, Mary Elizabeth and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {43,
	title = {Opi1p, Ume6p and Sin3p control expression from the promoter of the INO2 regulatory gene via a novel regulatory cascade.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {48},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 May},
	pages = {823-32},
	abstract = {The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for expression of most of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes. INO2 expression is regulated by a complex cascade that includes autoregulation, Opi1p-mediated repression and Ume6p-mediated activation. To screen for mutants with altered INO2 expression directly, we constructed an INO2-HIS3 reporter that provides a plate assay for INO2 promoter activity. This reporter was used to isolate mutants (dim1) that fail to repress expression of the INO2 gene in an otherwise wild-type strain. The dim1 mutants contain mutations in the OPI1 gene. To define further the mechanism for Ume6p regulation of INO2 expression, we isolated suppressors (rum1, 2, 3) of the ume6Delta mutation that overexpress the INO2-HIS3 gene. Two of the rum mutant groups contain mutations in the OPI1 and SIN3 genes showing that opi1 and sin3 mutations are epistatic to the ume6Delta mutation. These results are surprising given that Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p are known to form a complex that represses the expression of a diverse set of yeast genes. This prompted us to examine the effect of sin3Delta and rpd3Delta mutants on INO2-cat expression. Surprisingly, the sin3Delta allele overexpressed INO2-cat, whereas the rpd3Delta mutant had no effect. We also show that the UME6 gene does not affect the expression of an OPI1-cat reporter. This suggests that Ume6p does not regulate INO2 expression indirectly by regulating OPI1 expression.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Regulator, Genes, Reporter, Genetic Complementation Test, Histone Deacetylases, Methyltransferases, Phenotype, Phospholipids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Kaadige, Mohan R and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {563,
	title = {Stimulating the in situ activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003 Oct},
	pages = {5884-91},
	abstract = {The potential for removing uranium from contaminated groundwater by stimulating the in situ activity of dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganisms was evaluated in a uranium-contaminated aquifer located in Rifle, Colo. Acetate (1 to 3 mM) was injected into the subsurface over a 3-month period via an injection gallery composed of 20 injection wells, which was installed upgradient from a series of 15 monitoring wells. U(VI) concentrations decreased in as little as 9 days after acetate injection was initiated, and within 50 days uranium had declined below the prescribed treatment level of 0.18 micro M in some of the monitoring wells. Analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences and phospholipid fatty acid profiles demonstrated that the initial loss of uranium from the groundwater was associated with an enrichment of Geobacter species in the treatment zone. Fe(II) in the groundwater also increased during this period, suggesting that U(VI) reduction was coincident with Fe(III) reduction. As the acetate injection continued over 50 days there was a loss of sulfate from the groundwater and an accumulation of sulfide and the composition of the microbial community changed. Organisms with 16S rDNA sequences most closely related to those of sulfate reducers became predominant, and Geobacter species became a minor component of the community. This apparent switch from Fe(III) reduction to sulfate reduction as the terminal electron accepting process for the oxidation of the injected acetate was associated with an increase in uranium concentration in the groundwater. These results demonstrate that in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater is feasible but suggest that the strategy should be optimized to better maintain long-term activity of Geobacter species.},
	keywords = {Acetates, DNA, Ribosomal, Ecosystem, Fatty Acids, Ferric Compounds, Fresh Water, Geobacter, Mining, Oxidation-Reduction, Phospholipids, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sulfates, Uranium, Water Pollution, Chemical},
	issn = {0099-2240},
	author = {Anderson, Robert T and Vrionis, Helen A and Ortiz-Bernad, Irene and Resch, Charles T and Long, Philip E and Dayvault, Richard and Karp, Ken and Marutzky, Sam and Metzler, Donald R and Peacock, Aaron and White, David C and Lowe, Mary and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {45,
	title = {Combinatorial regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression by the UME6, SIN3 and RPD3 genes.},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000 Aug 15},
	pages = {3160-7},
	abstract = {The Ume6p-Sin3p-Rpd3p complex negatively regulates expression of genes containing a Ume6p binding site. However, these regulatory proteins also function independently to regulate gene expression both negatively and positively. The model system for this combinatorial regulation is the yeast phospholipid biosynthetic pathway. Sin3p negatively regulates the INO1, CHO1, CHO2 and OPI3 genes while Ume6p negatively regulates the INO1 gene and positively regulates the other genes. We have suggested that the positive regulation results from indirect effects on expression of the INO2 transcriptional activator gene. Here, we demonstrate that the effect of Ume6p on INO2 gene expression is also indirect. We also show that Rpd3p is a negative regulator of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression. The ability of Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p to differentially regulate expression of the phospholipid biosynthetic genes affects phospholipid composition. A sin3 mutant strain lacks detectable levels of phosphatidylethanolamine and elevated levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and a rpd3 mutant strain has reduced levels of PC. These alterations in membrane composition suggest that there may exist additional differences in regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression and that membrane compositions may be coordinated with other biological processes regulated by Ume6p, Sin3p and Rpd3p.},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Histone Deacetylases, Kinetics, Phospholipids, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	author = {Elkhaimi, M and Kaadige, M R and Kamath, D and Jackson, J C and Biliran, H and Lopes, J M}
}
@article {1711,
	title = {Comparison between procaine and isocarboxazid metabolism in vitro by a liver microsomal amidase-esterase.},
	journal = {Biochem Pharmacol},
	volume = {24},
	year = {1975},
	month = {1975 Aug 15},
	pages = {1517-21},
	keywords = {Amidohydrolases, Animals, Esterases, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, In Vitro Techniques, Isocarboxazid, Kinetics, Male, Metals, Microsomes, Liver, Phospholipids, Procaine, Proteins, Rats, Subcellular Fractions, Temperature},
	issn = {0006-2952},
	author = {Moroi, K and Sato, T}
}
