@article {809,
	title = {Single molecule analysis of a red fluorescent RecA protein reveals a defect in nucleoprotein filament nucleation that relates to its reduced biological functions.},
	journal = {J Biol Chem},
	volume = {284},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Jul 10},
	pages = {18664-73},
	abstract = {Fluorescent fusion proteins are exceedingly useful for monitoring protein localization in situ or visualizing protein behavior at the single molecule level. Unfortunately, some proteins are rendered inactive by the fusion. To circumvent this problem, we fused a hyperactive RecA protein (RecA803 protein) to monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP1) to produce a functional protein (RecA-RFP) that is suitable for in vivo and in vitro analysis. In vivo, the RecA-RFP partially restores UV resistance, conjugational recombination, and SOS induction to recA(-) cells. In vitro, the purified RecA-RFP protein forms a nucleoprotein filament whose k(cat) for single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity is reduced approximately 3-fold relative to wild-type protein, and which is largely inhibited by single-stranded DNA-binding protein. However, RecA protein is also a dATPase; dATP supports RecA-RFP nucleoprotein filament formation in the presence of single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Furthermore, as for the wild-type protein, the activities of RecA-RFP are further enhanced by shifting the pH to 6.2. As a consequence, RecA-RFP is proficient for DNA strand exchange with dATP or at lower pH. Finally, using single molecule visualization, RecA-RFP was seen to assemble into a continuous filament on duplex DNA, and to extend the DNA approximately 1.7-fold. Consistent with its attenuated activities, RecA-RFP nucleates onto double-stranded DNA approximately 3-fold more slowly than the wild-type protein, but still requires approximately 3 monomers to form the rate-limited nucleus needed for filament assembly. Thus, RecA-RFP reveals that its attenuated biological functions correlate with a reduced frequency of nucleoprotein filament nucleation at the single molecule level.},
	keywords = {Cell Nucleus, DNA, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Kinetics, Luminescent Proteins, Nucleoproteins, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0021-9258},
	doi = {10.1074/jbc.M109.004895},
	author = {Handa, Naofumi and Amitani, Ichiro and Gumlaw, Nathan and Sandler, Steven J and Kowalczykowski, Stephen C}
}
@article {811,
	title = {UvrD303, a hyperhelicase mutant that antagonizes RecA-dependent SOS expression by a mechanism that depends on its C terminus.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {191},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Mar},
	pages = {1429-38},
	abstract = {Genomic integrity is critical for an organism{\textquoteright}s survival and ability to reproduce. In Escherichia coli, the UvrD helicase has roles in nucleotide excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair and can limit reactions by RecA under certain circumstances. UvrD303 (D403A D404A) is a hyperhelicase mutant, and when expressed from a multicopy plasmid, it results in UV sensitivity (UV(s)), recombination deficiency, and antimutability. In order to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the UV(s) phenotype of uvrD303 cells, this mutation was transferred to the E. coli chromosome and studied in single copy. It is shown here that uvrD303 mutants are UV sensitive, recombination deficient, and antimutable and additionally have a moderate defect in inducing the SOS response after UV treatment. The UV-sensitive phenotype is epistatic with recA and additive with uvrA and is partially suppressed by removing the LexA repressor. Furthermore, uvrD303 is able to inhibit constitutive SOS expression caused by the recA730 mutation. The ability of UvrD303 to antagonize SOS expression was dependent on its 40 C-terminal amino acids. It is proposed that UvrD303, via its C terminus, can decrease the levels of RecA activity in the cell.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01415-08},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Leeson, Michael C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {812,
	title = {RecA-mediated SOS induction requires an extended filament conformation but no ATP hydrolysis.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Sep},
	pages = {1165-79},
	abstract = {The Escherichia coli SOS response to DNA damage is modulated by the RecA protein, a recombinase that forms an extended filament on single-stranded DNA and hydrolyzes ATP. The RecA K72R (recA2201) mutation eliminates the ATPase activity of RecA protein. The mutation also limits the capacity of RecA to form long filaments in the presence of ATP. Strains with this mutation do not undergo SOS induction in vivo. We have combined the K72R variant of RecA with another mutation, RecA E38K (recA730). In vitro, the double mutant RecA E38K/K72R (recA730,2201) mimics the K72R mutant protein in that it has no ATPase activity. The double mutant protein will form long extended filaments on ssDNA and facilitate LexA cleavage almost as well as wild-type, and do so in the presence of ATP. Unlike recA K72R, the recA E38K/K72R double mutant promotes SOS induction in vivo after UV treatment. Thus, SOS induction does not require ATP hydrolysis by the RecA protein, but does require formation of extended RecA filaments. The RecA E38K/K72R protein represents an improved reagent for studies of the function of ATP hydrolysis by RecA in vivo and in vitro.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphate, Amino Acid Substitution, Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Hydrolysis, Rec A Recombinases, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06341.x},
	author = {Gruenig, Marielle C and Renzette, Nicholas and Long, Edward and Chitteni-Pattu, Sindhu and Inman, Ross B and Cox, Michael M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {813,
	title = {Requirements for ATP binding and hydrolysis in RecA function in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {67},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Mar},
	pages = {1347-59},
	abstract = {RecA is essential for recombination, DNA repair and SOS induction in Escherichia coli. ATP hydrolysis is known to be important for RecA{\textquoteright}s roles in recombination and DNA repair. In vitro reactions modelling SOS induction minimally require ssDNA and non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues. This predicts that ATP hydrolysis will not be required for SOS induction in vivo. The requirement of ATP binding and hydrolysis for SOS induction in vivo is tested here through the study of recA4159 (K72A) and recA2201 (K72R). RecA4159 is thought to have reduced affinity for ATP. RecA2201 binds, but does not hydrolyse ATP. Neither mutant was able to induce SOS expression after UV irradiation. RecA2201, unlike RecA4159, could form filaments on DNA and storage structures as measured with RecA-GFP. RecA2201 was able to form hybrid filaments and storage structures and was either recessive or dominant to RecA(+), depending on the ratio of the two proteins. RecA4159 was unable to enter RecA(+) filaments on DNA or storage structures and was recessive to RecA(+). It is concluded that ATP hydrolysis is essential for SOS induction. It is proposed that ATP binding is essential for storage structure formation and ability to interact with other RecA proteins in a filament.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphate, Chromosomes, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Hydrolysis, Mutation, Protein Binding, Rec A Recombinases, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06130.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {820,
	title = {Localization of RecA in Escherichia coli K-12 using RecA-GFP.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {57},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Aug},
	pages = {1074-85},
	abstract = {RecA is important in recombination, DNA repair and repair of replication forks. It functions through the production of a protein-DNA filament. To study the localization of RecA in live Escherichia coli cells, the RecA protein was fused to the green fluorescence protein (GFP). Strains with this gene have recombination/DNA repair activities three- to tenfold below wild type (or about 1000-fold above that of a recA null mutant). RecA-GFP cells have a background of green fluorescence punctuated with up to five foci per cell. Two types of foci have been defined: 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-sensitive foci that are bound to DNA and DAPI-insensitive foci that are DNA-less aggregates/storage structures. In log phase cells, foci were not localized to any particular region. After UV irradiation, the number of foci increased and they localized to the cell centre. This suggested colocalization with the DNA replication factory. recA, recB and recF strains showed phenotypes and distributions of foci consistent with the predicted effects of these mutations.},
	keywords = {Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04755.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Gumlaw, Nathan and Nordman, Jared T and Krieger, Marlee and Yeh, Su-Ping and Long, Edward and Centore, Richard and Boonsombat, Ruethairat and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {823,
	title = {Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Sep},
	pages = {1343-57},
	abstract = {Many recombination, DNA repair and DNA replication mutants have high basal levels of SOS expression as determined by a sulAp-lacZ reporter gene system on a population of cells. Two opposing models to explain how the SOS expression is distributed in these cells are: (i) the {\textquoteright}Uniform Expression Model (UEM){\textquoteright} where expression is evenly distributed in all cells or (ii) the {\textquoteright}Two Population Model (TPM){\textquoteright} where some cells are highly induced while others are not at all. To distinguish between these two models, a method to quantify SOS expression in individual bacterial cells was developed by fusing an SOS promoter (sulAp) to the green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene and inserting it at attlambda on the Escherichia coli chromosome. It is shown that the fluorescence in sulAp-gfp cells is regulated by RecA and LexA. This system was then used to distinguish between the two models for several mutants. The patterns displayed by priA, dnaT, recG, uvrD, dam, ftsK, rnhA, polA and xerC mutants were explained best by the TPM while only lexA (def), lexA3 (ind-) and recA defective mutants were explained best by the UEM. These results are discussed in a context of how the processes of DNA replication and recombination may affect cells in a population differentially.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, DNA Damage, DNA Helicases, DNA Repair, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04225.x},
	author = {McCool, Jesse D and Long, Edward and Petrosino, Joseph F and Sandler, Hilary A and Rosenberg, Susan M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {825,
	title = {PriA mutations that affect PriA-PriC function during replication restart.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Aug},
	pages = {697-704},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, repair and restart of collapsed replication forks is thought to be essential for cell growth. The replication restart proteins, PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaB, DnaC, DnaG, DnaT and Rep, form redundant pathways that recognize repaired replication forks and restart them. Recognition, modulation of specific DNA structures and loading of the replicative helicase by the replication restart proteins, is likely to be important for replication restart. It has been hypothesized that PriB and PriC function with PriA in genetically separate and redundant PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways. In this study, the del(priB)302 or priC303:kan mutations were used to isolate the PriA-PriB and PriA-PriC pathways genetically so that the effects of three priA missense mutations, priA300 (K230R), priA301 (C479Y) and priA306 (L557P), on these pathways could be assessed. In a wild-type background, the three priA mutations had little, if any, effect on the phenotypes of UV resistance, basal levels of SOS expression and cell viability. In the priB mutant, priA300 and priA301 caused dramatic negative changes in the three phenotypes listed above (and others), whereas the third priA mutant allele, priA306, showed very little negative effect. In the priC mutant, all three priA mutations behaved similarly, producing little, if any, changes in phenotypes. We conclude that priA300 and priA301 mostly affect the PriA-PriC pathway and do so more than priA306. We suggest that PriA{\textquoteright}s helicase activity is important for the PriA-PriC pathway of replication restart.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage mu, Cell Division, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Lethal, Genotype, Models, Biological, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J and McCool, J D and Do, T T and Johansen, R U}
}
@article {836,
	title = {Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {143},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 May},
	pages = {5-13},
	abstract = {First identified as an essential component of the phi X174 in vitro DNA replication system, PriA has ATPase, helicase, translocase, and primosome-assembly activities. priA1::kan strains of Escherichia coli are sensitive to UV irradiation, deficient in homologous recombination following transduction, and filamentous. priA2::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression than wild type. We show that (1) priA1::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression, (2) priA2::kan strains are UVS and Rec-, (3) lexA3 suppresses the high basal levels of SOS expression of a priA2::kan strain, and (4) plasmid-encoded priA300 (K230R), a mutant allele retaining only the primosome-assembly activity of priA+, restores both UVR and Rec+ phenotypes to a priA2::kan strain. Finally, we have isolated 17 independent UVR Rec+ revertants of priA2::kan strains that carry extragenic suppressors. All 17 map in the C-terminal half of the dnaC gene. DnaC loads the DnaB helicase onto DNA as a prelude for primosome assembly and DNA replication. We conclude that priA{\textquoteright}s primosome-assembly activity is essential for DNA repair and recombination and that the dnaC suppressor mutations allow these processes to occur in the absence of priA.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophage phi X 174, beta-Galactosidase, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Genetic Markers, Mutagenesis, Phenotype, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, Suppression, Genetic, Transduction, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Samra, H S and Clark, A J}
}
@article {837,
	title = {Overlapping functions for recF and priA in cell viability and UV-inducible SOS expression are distinguished by dnaC809 in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {19},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996 Feb},
	pages = {871-80},
	abstract = {The recF and priA genes have roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination. Mutations in these genes also cause decreases in cell viability and alterations in UV-inducible sulAp-lacZ (SOS) expression. To find out if the two genes are in the same or different pathways for viability and SOS expression, the phenotypes of the double mutant strains were studied. The recF priA double mutant showed a lower viability and SOS expression level than either of the single mutants. In the case of cell viability, recF missense mutations decreased viability of a priA2::kan strain two to five-fold whereas recF null priA2::kan double mutants were not viable at all. dnaC809, a mutation that suppresses the UV-sensitive (UVs and Rec- phenotypes of priA2::kan, restored cell viability, but not UV-inducible SOS expression, to a priA recF strain. Since recF is epistatic with recO and recR (recOR) for UV resistance, recOR mutations were also tested with priA2::kan. No overlap was found between recOR and priA for viability and SOS expression. It is concluded that priA and recF have two different overlapping functions in viability and SOS expression that are distinguishable by the effects of dnaC809. The role of recF in a priA2::kan strain in cell viability is a new function for recF and unlike recF{\textquoteright}s other roles in DNA repair and recombination, is independent of recOR. A new role for priA in UV-inducible SOS expression in a recF mutant is also defined.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Lac Operon, Mutation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Replication Protein A, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	author = {Sandler, S J}
}
@article {838,
	title = {recO and recR mutations delay induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {246},
	year = {1995},
	month = {1995 Jan 20},
	pages = {254-8},
	abstract = {RecF, RecO and RecR, three of the important proteins of the RecF pathway of recombination, are also needed for repair of DNA damage due to UV irradiation. recF mutants are not proficient in cleaving LexA repressor in vivo following DNA damage: therefore they show a delay of induction of the SOS response. In this communication, by measuring the in vivo levels of LexA repressor using anti-LexA antibodies, we show that recO and recR mutant strains are also not proficient in LexA cleavage reactions. In addition, we show that recO and recR mutations delay induction of beta-galactosidase activity expressed from a lexA-regulated promoter following exposure of cells to UV, thus further supporting the idea that recF, recO and recR gene products are needed for induction of the SOS response.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, beta-Galactosidase, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Hegde, S and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Madiraju, M V}
}
@article {841,
	title = {RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {176},
	year = {1994},
	month = {1994 Jun},
	pages = {3661-72},
	abstract = {The recF, recO, and recR genes form the recFOR epistasis group for DNA repair. recF mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation and fail to properly induce the SOS response. Using plasmid derivatives that overexpress combinations of the recO+ and recR+ genes, we tested the hypothesis that high-level expression of recO+ and recR+ (recOR) in vivo will indirectly suppress the recF mutant phenotypes mentioned above. We found that overexpression of just recR+ from the plasmid will partially suppress both phenotypes. Expression of the chromosomal recO+ gene is essential for the recR+ suppression. Hence we call this RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes. RecOR suppression of SOS induction is more efficient with recO+ expression from a plasmid than with recO+ expression from the chromosome. This is not true for RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity (the two are equal). Comparison of RecOR suppression with the suppression caused by recA801 and recA803 shows that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity is more effective than recA803 suppression and that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity, like recA801 suppression, requires recJ+. We present a model that explains the data and proposes a function for the recFOR epistasis group in the induction of the SOS response and recombinational DNA repair.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Plasmids, SOS Response (Genetics), Suppression, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
@article {839,
	title = {Studies on the mechanism of reduction of UV-inducible sulAp expression by recF overexpression in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Gen Genet},
	volume = {245},
	year = {1994},
	month = {1994 Dec 15},
	pages = {741-9},
	abstract = {UV-inducible sulAp expression, an indicator of the SOS response, is reduced by recF+ overexpression in vivo. Different DNA-damaging agents and amounts of RecO and RecR were tested for their effects on this phenotype. It was found that recF+ overexpression reduced sulAp expression after DNA damage by mitomycin C or nalidixic acid, recO+ and recR+ overexpression partially suppressed the reduction of UV-induced sulAp expression caused by recF+ overexpression. The requirement for ATP binding to RecF to produce the phenotype was tested by genetically altering the putative phosphate binding cleft of recF in a way that should prevent the mutant recF protein from binding ATP. It was found that a change of lysine to glutamine at codon 36 results in a mutant recF protein (RecF4115) that is unable to reduce UV-inducible sulAp expression when overproduced. It is inferred from these results that recF overexpression may reduce UV-inducible sulAp expression by a mechanism that is sensitive to the ability of RecF to bind ATP and to the levels of RecO and RecR (RecOR) in the cell, but not to the type of DNA damage per se. Models are explored that can explain how recF+ overexpression reduces UV induction of sulAp and how RecOR overproduction might suppress this phenotype.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, DNA Primers, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Restriction Mapping, RNA, Messenger, SOS Response (Genetics), Structure-Activity Relationship, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0026-8925},
	author = {Sandler, S J}
}
@article {843,
	title = {Use of high and low level overexpression plasmids to test mutant alleles of the recF gene of Escherichia coli K-12 for partial activity.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {135},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993 Nov},
	pages = {643-54},
	abstract = {We showed that sufficient overexpression of the wild-type recF gene interfered with three normal cell functions: (1) UV induction of transcription from the LexA-protein-repressed sulA promoter, (2) UV resistance and (3) cell viability at 42 degrees. To show this, we altered a low-level overexpressing recF+ plasmid with a set of structurally neutral mutations that increased the rate of expression of recF. The resulting high-level overexpressing plasmid interfered with UV induction of the sulA promoter, as did the low-level overexpressing plasmid. It also reduced UV resistance more than its low level progenitor and decreased viability at 42 degrees, an effect not seen with the low-level plasmid. We used the high-level plasmid to test four recF structural mutations for residual activity. The structural alleles consisted of an insertion mutation, two single amino acid substitution mutations and a double amino acid substitution mutation. On the Escherichia coli chromosome the three substitution mutations acted similarly to a recF deletion in reducing UV resistance in a recB21 recC22 sbcB15 sbcC201 genetic background. By this test, therefore, all three appeared to be null alleles. Measurements of conjugational recombination revealed, however, that the three substitution mutations may have residual activity. On the high-level overexpressing plasmid all three substitution mutations definitely showed partial activity. By contrast, the insertion mutation on the high-level overexpressing plasmid showed no partial activity and can be considered a true null mutation. One of the substitutions, recF143, showed a property attributable to a leaky mutation. Another substitution, recF4101, may block selectively two of the three interference phenotypes, thus allowing us to infer a mechanism for them.},
	keywords = {Alleles, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression, Genes, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Mutation, Phenotype, Plasmids, Radiation Tolerance, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	author = {Sandler, S J and Clark, A J}
}
