@article {31,
	title = {Derepression of INO1 transcription requires cooperation between the Ino2p-Ino4p heterodimer and Cbf1p and recruitment of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex.},
	journal = {Eukaryot Cell},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 Dec},
	pages = {1845-55},
	abstract = {<p>The Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO1 gene encodes the structural enzyme inositol-3-phosphate synthase for the synthesis de novo of inositol and inositol-containing phospholipids. The transcription of INO1 is completely derepressed in the absence of inositol and choline (I(-) C(-)). Derepression requires the binding of the Ino2p-Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) heterodimer to the UAS(INO) promoter element. We report here the requirement of a third bHLH protein, centromere-binding factor 1 (Cbf1p), for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription. We found that Cbf1p regulates INO1 transcription by binding to sites distal to the INO1 promoter and encompassing the upstream SNA3 open reading frame (ORF) and promoter. The binding of Cbf1p requires Ino2p-Ino4p binding to the UAS(INO) sites in the INO1 promoter and vice versa, suggesting a cooperative mechanism. Furthermore, Cbf1p binding to the upstream sites was required for the binding of the ISW2 chromatin-remodeling complex to the Ino2p-Ino4p-binding sites on the INO1 promoter. Consistent with this, ISW2 was also required for the complete derepression of INO1 transcription.</p>
},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromatin, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Dimerization, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Myo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1535-9786},
	doi = {10.1128/EC.00144-10},
	author = {Shetty, Ameet and Lopes, John M}
}
@article {823,
	title = {Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Sep},
	pages = {1343-57},
	abstract = {Many recombination, DNA repair and DNA replication mutants have high basal levels of SOS expression as determined by a sulAp-lacZ reporter gene system on a population of cells. Two opposing models to explain how the SOS expression is distributed in these cells are: (i) the {\textquoteright}Uniform Expression Model (UEM){\textquoteright} where expression is evenly distributed in all cells or (ii) the {\textquoteright}Two Population Model (TPM){\textquoteright} where some cells are highly induced while others are not at all. To distinguish between these two models, a method to quantify SOS expression in individual bacterial cells was developed by fusing an SOS promoter (sulAp) to the green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene and inserting it at attlambda on the Escherichia coli chromosome. It is shown that the fluorescence in sulAp-gfp cells is regulated by RecA and LexA. This system was then used to distinguish between the two models for several mutants. The patterns displayed by priA, dnaT, recG, uvrD, dam, ftsK, rnhA, polA and xerC mutants were explained best by the TPM while only lexA (def), lexA3 (ind-) and recA defective mutants were explained best by the UEM. These results are discussed in a context of how the processes of DNA replication and recombination may affect cells in a population differentially.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, DNA Damage, DNA Helicases, DNA Repair, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04225.x},
	author = {McCool, Jesse D and Long, Edward and Petrosino, Joseph F and Sandler, Hilary A and Rosenberg, Susan M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {826,
	title = {Effects of mutations involving cell division, recombination, and chromosome dimer resolution on a priA2::kan mutant.},
	journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A},
	volume = {98},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001 Jul 17},
	pages = {8203-10},
	abstract = {Recombinational repair of replication forks can occur either to a crossover (XO) or noncrossover (non-XO) depending on Holliday junction resolution. Once the fork is repaired by recombination, PriA is important for restarting these forks in Escherichia coli. PriA mutants are Rec(-) and UV sensitive and have poor viability and 10-fold elevated basal levels of SOS expression. PriA sulB mutant cells and their nucleoids were studied by differential interference contrast and fluorescence microscopy of 4{\textquoteright},6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-stained log phase cells. Two populations of cells were seen. Eighty four percent appeared like wild type, and 16\% of the cells were filamented and had poorly partitioned chromosomes (Par(-)). To probe potential mechanisms leading to the two populations of cells, mutations were added to the priA sulB mutant. Mutating sulA or introducing lexA3 decreased, but did not eliminate filamentation or defects in partitioning. Mutating either recA or recB virtually eliminated the Par(-) phenotype. Filamentation in the recB mutant decreased to 3\%, but increased to 28\% in the recA mutant. The ability to resolve and/or branch migrate Holliday junctions also appeared crucial in the priA mutant because removing either recG or ruvC was lethal. Lastly, it was tested whether the ability to resolve chromosome dimers caused by XOs was important in a priA mutant by mutating dif and the C-terminal portion of ftsK. Mutation of dif showed no change in phenotype whereas ftsK1cat was lethal with priA2kan. A model is proposed where the PriA-independent pathway of replication restart functions at forks that have been repaired to non-XOs.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Division, Chromosomes, Bacterial, Dimerization, DNA Helicases, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Gene Expression, Membrane Proteins, Mutagenesis, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0027-8424},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.121007698},
	author = {McCool, J D and Sandler, S J}
}
@article {833,
	title = {RadA protein is an archaeal RecA protein homolog that catalyzes DNA strand exchange.},
	journal = {Genes Dev},
	volume = {12},
	year = {1998},
	month = {1998 May 1},
	pages = {1248-53},
	abstract = {With the discovery that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein is both structurally and functionally similar to the Escherichia coli RecA protein, the RecA paradigm for homologous recombination was extended to the Eucarya. The ubiquitous presence of RecA and Rad51 protein homologs raises the question of whether this archetypal protein exists within the third domain of life, the Archaea. Here we present the isolation of a Rad51/RecA protein homolog from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus, and show that this protein, RadA, possesses the characteristics of a DNA strand exchange protein: The RadA protein is a DNA-dependent ATPase, forms a nucleoprotein filament on DNA, and catalyzes DNA pairing and strand exchange.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Archaeal Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, DNA Helicases, DNA, Archaeal, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Genes, Archaeal, Nucleoproteins, Rad51 Recombinase, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Sulfolobus},
	issn = {0890-9369},
	author = {Seitz, E M and Brockman, J P and Sandler, S J and Clark, A J and Kowalczykowski, S C}
}
