@article {814,
	title = {XthA (Exonuclease III) regulates loading of RecA onto DNA substrates in log phase Escherichia coli cells.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {67},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jan},
	pages = {88-101},
	abstract = {Exonucleases can modify DNA substrates created during DNA replication, recombination and repair. In Escherichia coli, the effects of several 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases on RecA loading were studied by assaying RecA-GFP foci formation. Mutations in xthA (ExoIII), xseAB (ExoVII), xni (ExoIX), exoX (ExoX) and tatD (ExoXI) increased the number of RecA-GFP foci twofold to threefold in a population of log phase cells grown in minimal medium. These increases depend on xonA. Epistasis analysis shows that ExoVII, ExoX, ExoIX and ExoXI function in a common pathway, distinct from ExoIII (and ExoI is upstream of both pathways). It is shown (paradoxically) that in xthA mutants, RecA-GFP loading is predominantly RecBCD-dependent and that xthA recB double mutants are viable. Experiments show that while log phase xthA cells have twofold more double-stranded breaks (DSBs) than wild type, they do not induce the SOS response. The increase in RecA loading is independent of the base excision repair (BER) proteins Nth, MutM and Nei. It is proposed that log phase cells produce DSBs that do not induce the SOS response. Furthermore, ExoI, ExoIII and the other 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases process these DSBs, antagonizing the RecBCD pathway of RecA loading, thus regulating the availability of these substrates for recombination.},
	keywords = {DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Microbial Viability, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06026.x},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Lestini, Roxane and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {817,
	title = {UvrD limits the number and intensities of RecA-green fluorescent protein structures in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {189},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007 Apr},
	pages = {2915-20},
	abstract = {RecA is important for recombination, DNA repair, and SOS induction. In Escherichia coli, RecBCD, RecFOR, and RecJQ prepare DNA substrates onto which RecA binds. UvrD is a 3{\textquoteright}-to-5{\textquoteright} helicase that participates in methyl-directed mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair. uvrD deletion mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation, hypermutable, and hyper-rec. In vitro, UvrD can dissociate RecA from single-stranded DNA. Other experiments suggest that UvrD removes RecA from DNA where it promotes unproductive reactions. To test if UvrD limits the number and/or the size of RecA-DNA structures in vivo, an uvrD mutation was combined with recA-gfp. This recA allele allows the number of RecA structures and the amount of RecA at these structures to be assayed in living cells. uvrD mutants show a threefold increase in the number of RecA-GFP foci, and these foci are, on average, nearly twofold higher in relative intensity. The increased number of RecA-green fluorescent protein foci in the uvrD mutant is dependent on recF, recO, recR, recJ, and recQ. The increase in average relative intensity is dependent on recO and recQ. These data support an in vivo role for UvrD in removing RecA from the DNA.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins},
	issn = {0021-9193},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01777-06},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {820,
	title = {Localization of RecA in Escherichia coli K-12 using RecA-GFP.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {57},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Aug},
	pages = {1074-85},
	abstract = {RecA is important in recombination, DNA repair and repair of replication forks. It functions through the production of a protein-DNA filament. To study the localization of RecA in live Escherichia coli cells, the RecA protein was fused to the green fluorescence protein (GFP). Strains with this gene have recombination/DNA repair activities three- to tenfold below wild type (or about 1000-fold above that of a recA null mutant). RecA-GFP cells have a background of green fluorescence punctuated with up to five foci per cell. Two types of foci have been defined: 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-sensitive foci that are bound to DNA and DAPI-insensitive foci that are DNA-less aggregates/storage structures. In log phase cells, foci were not localized to any particular region. After UV irradiation, the number of foci increased and they localized to the cell centre. This suggested colocalization with the DNA replication factory. recA, recB and recF strains showed phenotypes and distributions of foci consistent with the predicted effects of these mutations.},
	keywords = {Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04755.x},
	author = {Renzette, Nicholas and Gumlaw, Nathan and Nordman, Jared T and Krieger, Marlee and Yeh, Su-Ping and Long, Edward and Centore, Richard and Boonsombat, Ruethairat and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {823,
	title = {Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Sep},
	pages = {1343-57},
	abstract = {Many recombination, DNA repair and DNA replication mutants have high basal levels of SOS expression as determined by a sulAp-lacZ reporter gene system on a population of cells. Two opposing models to explain how the SOS expression is distributed in these cells are: (i) the {\textquoteright}Uniform Expression Model (UEM){\textquoteright} where expression is evenly distributed in all cells or (ii) the {\textquoteright}Two Population Model (TPM){\textquoteright} where some cells are highly induced while others are not at all. To distinguish between these two models, a method to quantify SOS expression in individual bacterial cells was developed by fusing an SOS promoter (sulAp) to the green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene and inserting it at attlambda on the Escherichia coli chromosome. It is shown that the fluorescence in sulAp-gfp cells is regulated by RecA and LexA. This system was then used to distinguish between the two models for several mutants. The patterns displayed by priA, dnaT, recG, uvrD, dam, ftsK, rnhA, polA and xerC mutants were explained best by the TPM while only lexA (def), lexA3 (ind-) and recA defective mutants were explained best by the UEM. These results are discussed in a context of how the processes of DNA replication and recombination may affect cells in a population differentially.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, DNA Damage, DNA Helicases, DNA Repair, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04225.x},
	author = {McCool, Jesse D and Long, Edward and Petrosino, Joseph F and Sandler, Hilary A and Rosenberg, Susan M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
