@article {806,
	title = {RecA4142 causes SOS constitutive expression by loading onto reversed replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {192},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010 May},
	pages = {2575-82},
	abstract = {Escherichia coli initiates the SOS response when single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage is bound by RecA and forms a RecA-DNA filament. recA SOS constitutive [recA(Con)] mutants induce the SOS response in the absence of DNA damage. It has been proposed that recA(Con) mutants bind to ssDNA at replication forks, although the specific mechanism is unknown. Previously, it had been shown that recA4142(F217Y), a novel recA(Con) mutant, was dependent on RecBCD for its high SOS constitutive [SOS(Con)] expression. This was presumably because RecA4142 was loaded at a double-strand end (DSE) of DNA. Herein, it is shown that recA4142 SOS(Con) expression is additionally dependent on ruvAB (replication fork reversal [RFR] activity only) and recJ (5{\textquoteright}-->3{\textquoteright} exonuclease), xonA (3{\textquoteright}-->5{\textquoteright} exonuclease) and partially dependent on recQ (helicase). Lastly, sbcCD mutations (Mre11/Rad50 homolog) in recA4142 strains caused full SOS(Con) expression in an ruvAB-, recBCD-, recJ-, and xonA-independent manner. It is hypothesized that RuvAB catalyzes RFR, RecJ and XonA blunt the DSE (created by the RFR), and then RecBCD loads RecA4142 onto this end to produce SOS(Con) expression. In sbcCD mutants, RecA4142 can bind other DNA substrates by itself that are normally degraded by the SbcCD nuclease.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA Helicases, DNA Replication, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonuclease V, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Exonucleases, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01623-09},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Massoni, Shawn C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {808,
	title = {Suppression of constitutive SOS expression by recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) requires UvrD and RecX in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {73},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Jul},
	pages = {226-39},
	abstract = {Sensing DNA damage and initiation of genetic responses to repair DNA damage are critical to cell survival. In Escherichia coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced by DNA damage creating a RecA-DNA filament that interacts with the LexA repressor inducing the SOS response. RecA filament stability is negatively modulated by RecX and UvrD. recA730 (E38K) and recA4142 (F217Y) constitutively express the SOS response. recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) are intragenic suppressors of the constitutive SOS phenotype of recA730. Herein, it is shown that these suppressors are not allele specific and can suppress SOS(C) expression of recA730 and recA4142 in cis and in trans. recA4162 and recA4164 single mutants (and the recA730 and recA4142 derivatives) are Rec(+), UV(R) and are able to induce the SOS response after UV treatment like wild-type. UvrD and RecX are required for the suppression in two (recA730,4164 and recA4142,4162) of the four double mutants tested. To explain the data, one model suggests that recA(C) alleles promote SOS(C) expression by mimicking RecA filament structures that induce SOS and the suppressor alleles mimic RecA filament at end of SOS. UvrD and RecX are attracted to these latter structures to help dismantle or destabilize the RecA filament.},
	keywords = {Alleles, DNA Helicases, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Missense, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics), Substrate Specificity},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06765.x},
	author = {Long, Jarukit E and Renzette, Nicholas and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {811,
	title = {UvrD303, a hyperhelicase mutant that antagonizes RecA-dependent SOS expression by a mechanism that depends on its C terminus.},
	journal = {J Bacteriol},
	volume = {191},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Mar},
	pages = {1429-38},
	abstract = {Genomic integrity is critical for an organism{\textquoteright}s survival and ability to reproduce. In Escherichia coli, the UvrD helicase has roles in nucleotide excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair and can limit reactions by RecA under certain circumstances. UvrD303 (D403A D404A) is a hyperhelicase mutant, and when expressed from a multicopy plasmid, it results in UV sensitivity (UV(s)), recombination deficiency, and antimutability. In order to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the UV(s) phenotype of uvrD303 cells, this mutation was transferred to the E. coli chromosome and studied in single copy. It is shown here that uvrD303 mutants are UV sensitive, recombination deficient, and antimutable and additionally have a moderate defect in inducing the SOS response after UV treatment. The UV-sensitive phenotype is epistatic with recA and additive with uvrA and is partially suppressed by removing the LexA repressor. Furthermore, uvrD303 is able to inhibit constitutive SOS expression caused by the recA730 mutation. The ability of UvrD303 to antagonize SOS expression was dependent on its 40 C-terminal amino acids. It is proposed that UvrD303, via its C terminus, can decrease the levels of RecA activity in the cell.},
	keywords = {DNA Helicases, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, Recombination, Genetic, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1098-5530},
	doi = {10.1128/JB.01415-08},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Leeson, Michael C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {810,
	title = {Differential requirements of two recA mutants for constitutive SOS expression in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {PLoS One},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {e4100},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Repairing DNA damage begins with its detection and is often followed by elicitation of a cellular response. In E. coli, RecA polymerizes on ssDNA produced after DNA damage and induces the SOS Response. The RecA-DNA filament is an allosteric effector of LexA auto-proteolysis. LexA is the repressor of the SOS Response. Not all RecA-DNA filaments, however, lead to an SOS Response. Certain recA mutants express the SOS Response (recA(C)) in the absence of external DNA damage in log phase cells.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Genetic analysis of two recA(C) mutants was used to determine the mechanism of constitutive SOS (SOS(C)) expression in a population of log phase cells using fluorescence of single cells carrying an SOS reporter system (sulAp-gfp). SOS(C) expression in recA4142 mutants was dependent on its initial level of transcription, recBCD, recFOR, recX, dinI, xthA and the type of medium in which the cells were grown. SOS(C) expression in recA730 mutants was affected by none of the mutations or conditions tested above.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that not all recA(C) alleles cause SOS(C) expression by the same mechanism. It is hypothesized that RecA4142 is loaded on to a double-strand end of DNA and that the RecA filament is stabilized by the presence of DinI and destabilized by RecX. RecFOR regulate the activity of RecX to destabilize the RecA filament. RecA730 causes SOS(C) expression by binding to ssDNA in a mechanism yet to be determined.},
	keywords = {Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Models, Biological, Mutation, Rec A Recombinases, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0004100},
	author = {Long, Jarukit Edward and Renzette, Nicholas and Centore, Richard C and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {812,
	title = {RecA-mediated SOS induction requires an extended filament conformation but no ATP hydrolysis.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Sep},
	pages = {1165-79},
	abstract = {The Escherichia coli SOS response to DNA damage is modulated by the RecA protein, a recombinase that forms an extended filament on single-stranded DNA and hydrolyzes ATP. The RecA K72R (recA2201) mutation eliminates the ATPase activity of RecA protein. The mutation also limits the capacity of RecA to form long filaments in the presence of ATP. Strains with this mutation do not undergo SOS induction in vivo. We have combined the K72R variant of RecA with another mutation, RecA E38K (recA730). In vitro, the double mutant RecA E38K/K72R (recA730,2201) mimics the K72R mutant protein in that it has no ATPase activity. The double mutant protein will form long extended filaments on ssDNA and facilitate LexA cleavage almost as well as wild-type, and do so in the presence of ATP. Unlike recA K72R, the recA E38K/K72R double mutant promotes SOS induction in vivo after UV treatment. Thus, SOS induction does not require ATP hydrolysis by the RecA protein, but does require formation of extended RecA filaments. The RecA E38K/K72R protein represents an improved reagent for studies of the function of ATP hydrolysis by RecA in vivo and in vitro.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphate, Amino Acid Substitution, Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Hydrolysis, Rec A Recombinases, Serine Endopeptidases, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06341.x},
	author = {Gruenig, Marielle C and Renzette, Nicholas and Long, Edward and Chitteni-Pattu, Sindhu and Inman, Ross B and Cox, Michael M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {814,
	title = {XthA (Exonuclease III) regulates loading of RecA onto DNA substrates in log phase Escherichia coli cells.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {67},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Jan},
	pages = {88-101},
	abstract = {Exonucleases can modify DNA substrates created during DNA replication, recombination and repair. In Escherichia coli, the effects of several 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases on RecA loading were studied by assaying RecA-GFP foci formation. Mutations in xthA (ExoIII), xseAB (ExoVII), xni (ExoIX), exoX (ExoX) and tatD (ExoXI) increased the number of RecA-GFP foci twofold to threefold in a population of log phase cells grown in minimal medium. These increases depend on xonA. Epistasis analysis shows that ExoVII, ExoX, ExoIX and ExoXI function in a common pathway, distinct from ExoIII (and ExoI is upstream of both pathways). It is shown (paradoxically) that in xthA mutants, RecA-GFP loading is predominantly RecBCD-dependent and that xthA recB double mutants are viable. Experiments show that while log phase xthA cells have twofold more double-stranded breaks (DSBs) than wild type, they do not induce the SOS response. The increase in RecA loading is independent of the base excision repair (BER) proteins Nth, MutM and Nei. It is proposed that log phase cells produce DSBs that do not induce the SOS response. Furthermore, ExoI, ExoIII and the other 3{\textquoteright}-5{\textquoteright} exonucleases process these DSBs, antagonizing the RecBCD pathway of RecA loading, thus regulating the availability of these substrates for recombination.},
	keywords = {DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA Repair, DNA, Bacterial, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Exodeoxyribonucleases, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Microbial Viability, Rec A Recombinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06026.x},
	author = {Centore, Richard C and Lestini, Roxane and Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {821,
	title = {Requirements for replication restart proteins during constitutive stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli K-12.},
	journal = {Genetics},
	volume = {169},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 Apr},
	pages = {1799-806},
	abstract = {Constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR) is a mechanism for replisome loading in Escherichia coli K-12. This occurs in a dnaA-independent fashion in an rnhA mutant. cSDR is dependent on recA, priA, and transcription. In this report, it is shown that dnaA rnhA mutants using cSDR for initiation of their DNA replication additionally require priB, but not priC, for viability. Two subtle priA missense mutations either eliminated the ability to grow using cSDR (priA301 C479Y) or resulted in very small colonies (priA300 K230R). DnaC809, a priA suppressor, failed to allow priA or priB mutants to grow using cSDR to initiate DNA replication. Furthermore, unlike dnaC(+) strains, dnaC809 strains require priC for cSDR. DnaC809,820, a priC-independent suppressor of priA2::kan phenotypes, allowed priA and priC (but not priB) mutants to grow using cSDR to initiate DNA replication. It is also shown that rep and rnhA mutations are synthetically lethal. DnaC809 and dnaC809,820 mutations suppress this lethality. Rep is further shown to be required for cSDR in a dnaC809 strain. A model whereby these different sets of replication restart proteins interact preferentially with substrates associated with either RecA or SSB during replication restart and cSDR, respectively, is proposed.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, DNA, DNA Replication, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Macromolecular Substances, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Rec A Recombinases, RNA, SOS Response (Genetics)},
	issn = {0016-6731},
	doi = {10.1534/genetics.104.036962},
	author = {Sandler, Steven J}
}
@article {823,
	title = {Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Sep},
	pages = {1343-57},
	abstract = {Many recombination, DNA repair and DNA replication mutants have high basal levels of SOS expression as determined by a sulAp-lacZ reporter gene system on a population of cells. Two opposing models to explain how the SOS expression is distributed in these cells are: (i) the {\textquoteright}Uniform Expression Model (UEM){\textquoteright} where expression is evenly distributed in all cells or (ii) the {\textquoteright}Two Population Model (TPM){\textquoteright} where some cells are highly induced while others are not at all. To distinguish between these two models, a method to quantify SOS expression in individual bacterial cells was developed by fusing an SOS promoter (sulAp) to the green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene and inserting it at attlambda on the Escherichia coli chromosome. It is shown that the fluorescence in sulAp-gfp cells is regulated by RecA and LexA. This system was then used to distinguish between the two models for several mutants. The patterns displayed by priA, dnaT, recG, uvrD, dam, ftsK, rnhA, polA and xerC mutants were explained best by the TPM while only lexA (def), lexA3 (ind-) and recA defective mutants were explained best by the UEM. These results are discussed in a context of how the processes of DNA replication and recombination may affect cells in a population differentially.},
	keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, DNA Damage, DNA Helicases, DNA Repair, Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, SOS Response (Genetics), Ultraviolet Rays},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04225.x},
	author = {McCool, Jesse D and Long, Edward and Petrosino, Joseph F and Sandler, Hilary A and Rosenberg, Susan M and Sandler, Steven J}
}
