@article {488,
	title = {Gene transcript analysis of assimilatory iron limitation in Geobacteraceae during groundwater bioremediation.},
	journal = {Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 May},
	pages = {1218-30},
	abstract = {Limitations on the availability of Fe(III) as an electron acceptor are thought to play an important role in restricting the growth and activity of Geobacter species during bioremediation of contaminated subsurface environments, but the possibility that these organisms might also be limited in the subsurface by the availability of iron for assimilatory purposes was not previously considered because copious quantities of Fe(II) are produced as the result of Fe(III) reduction. Analysis of multiple Geobacteraceae genomes revealed the presence of a three-gene cluster consisting of homologues of two iron-dependent regulators, fur and dtxR (ideR), separated by a homologue of feoB, which encodes an Fe(II) uptake protein. This cluster appears to be conserved among members of the Geobacteraceae and was detected in several environments. Expression of the fur-feoB-ideR cluster decreased as Fe(II) concentrations increased in chemostat cultures. The number of Geobacteraceae feoB transcripts in groundwater samples from a site undergoing in situ uranium bioremediation was relatively high until the concentration of dissolved Fe(II) increased near the end of the field experiment. These results suggest that, because much of the Fe(II) is sequestered in solid phases, Geobacter species, which have a high requirement for iron for iron-sulfur proteins, may be limited by the amount of iron available for assimilatory purposes. These results demonstrate the ability of transcript analysis to reveal previously unsuspected aspects of the in situ physiology of microorganisms in subsurface environments.},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biodegradation, Environmental, Culture Media, Ferric Compounds, Ferrous Compounds, Fresh Water, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Geobacter, Iron, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Repressor Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transcription, Genetic, Uranium, Water Pollution, Radioactive},
	issn = {1462-2920},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01537.x},
	author = {O{\textquoteright}Neil, Regina A and Holmes, Dawn E and Coppi, Maddalena V and Adams, Lorrie A and Larrahondo, M Juliana and Ward, Joy E and Nevin, Kelly P and Woodard, Trevor L and Vrionis, Helen A and N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {505,
	title = {Importance of c-Type cytochromes for U(VI) reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {BMC Microbiol},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007},
	pages = {16},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: In order to study the mechanism of U(VI) reduction, the effect of deleting c-type cytochrome genes on the capacity of Geobacter sulfurreducens to reduce U(VI) with acetate serving as the electron donor was investigated.

RESULTS: The ability of several c-type cytochrome deficient mutants to reduce U(VI) was lower than that of the wild type strain. Elimination of two confirmed outer membrane cytochromes and two putative outer membrane cytochromes significantly decreased (ca. 50-60\%) the ability of G. sulfurreducens to reduce U(VI). Involvement in U(VI) reduction did not appear to be a general property of outer membrane cytochromes, as elimination of two other confirmed outer membrane cytochromes, OmcB and OmcC, had very little impact on U(VI) reduction. Among the periplasmic cytochromes, only MacA, proposed to transfer electrons from the inner membrane to the periplasm, appeared to play a significant role in U(VI) reduction. A subpopulation of both wild type and U(VI) reduction-impaired cells, 24-30\%, accumulated amorphous uranium in the periplasm. Comparison of uranium-accumulating cells demonstrated a similar amount of periplasmic uranium accumulation in U(VI) reduction-impaired and wild type G. sulfurreducens. Assessment of the ability of the various suspensions to reduce Fe(III) revealed no correlation between the impact of cytochrome deletion on U(VI) reduction and reduction of Fe(III) hydroxide and chelated Fe(III).

CONCLUSION: This study indicates that c-type cytochromes are involved in U(VI) reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. The data provide new evidence for extracellular uranium reduction by G. sulfurreducens but do not rule out the possibility of periplasmic uranium reduction. Occurrence of U(VI) reduction at the cell surface is supported by the significant impact of elimination of outer membrane cytochromes on U(VI) reduction and the lack of correlation between periplasmic uranium accumulation and the capacity for uranium reduction. Periplasmic uranium accumulation may reflect the ability of uranium to penetrate the outer membrane rather than the occurrence of enzymatic U(VI) reduction. Elimination of cytochromes rarely had a similar impact on both Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction, suggesting that there are differences in the routes of electron transfer to U(VI) and Fe(III). Further studies are required to clarify the pathways leading to U(VI) reduction in G. sulfurreducens.},
	keywords = {Biodegradation, Environmental, Cytochrome c Group, Ferric Compounds, Geobacter, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Mutation, Oxidation-Reduction, Periplasm, Uranium},
	issn = {1471-2180},
	doi = {10.1186/1471-2180-7-16},
	author = {Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Coppi, Maddalena V and Korenevsky, Anton A and DiDonato, Laurie N and Sullivan, Sara A and Konishi, Hiromi and Xu, Huifang and Leang, Ching and Butler, Jessica E and Kim, Byoung-Chan and Lovley, Derek R}
}
