@article {471,
	title = {Transcriptome of Geobacter uraniireducens growing in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments.},
	journal = {ISME J},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Feb},
	pages = {216-30},
	abstract = {To learn more about the physiological state of Geobacter species living in subsurface sediments, heat-sterilized sediments from a uranium-contaminated aquifer in Rifle, Colorado, were inoculated with Geobacter uraniireducens, a pure culture representative of the Geobacter species that predominates during in situ uranium bioremediation at this site. Whole-genome microarray analysis comparing sediment-grown G. uraniireducens with cells grown in defined culture medium indicated that there were 1084 genes that had higher transcript levels during growth in sediments. Thirty-four c-type cytochrome genes were upregulated in the sediment-grown cells, including several genes that are homologous to cytochromes that are required for optimal Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction by G. sulfurreducens. Sediment-grown cells also had higher levels of transcripts, indicative of such physiological states as nitrogen limitation, phosphate limitation and heavy metal stress. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR showed that many of the metabolic indicator genes that appeared to be upregulated in sediment-grown G. uraniireducens also showed an increase in expression in the natural community of Geobacter species present during an in situ uranium bioremediation field experiment at the Rifle site. These results demonstrate that it is feasible to monitor gene expression of a microorganism growing in sediments on a genome scale and that analysis of the physiological status of a pure culture growing in subsurface sediments can provide insights into the factors controlling the physiology of natural subsurface communities.},
	keywords = {Colorado, DNA, Bacterial, Environmental Microbiology, Gene Expression Profiling, Geobacter, Geologic Sediments, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Uranium},
	issn = {1751-7370},
	doi = {10.1038/ismej.2008.89},
	author = {Holmes, Dawn E and O{\textquoteright}Neil, Regina A and Chavan, Milind A and N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Vrionis, Helen A and Perpetua, Lorrie A and Larrahondo, M Juliana and DiDonato, Raymond and Liu, Anna and Lovley, Derek R}
}
@article {482,
	title = {Sustained removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater following stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction.},
	journal = {Environ Sci Technol},
	volume = {42},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Apr 15},
	pages = {2999-3004},
	abstract = {Previous field studies on in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater in an aquifer in Rifle, Colorado identified two distinct phases following the addition of acetate to stimulate microbial respiration. In phase I, Geobacter species are the predominant organisms, Fe(III) is reduced, and microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) removes uranium from the groundwater. In phase II, Fe(III) is depleted, sulfate is reduced, and sulfate-reducing bacteria predominate. Long-term monitoring revealed an unexpected third phase during which U(VI) removal continues even after acetate additions are stopped. All three of these phases were successfully reproduced in flow-through sediment columns. When sediments from the third phase were heat sterilized, the capacity for U(VI) removal was lost. In the live sediments U(VI) removed from the groundwater was recovered as U(VI) in the sediments. This contrasts to the recovery of U(IV) in sediments resulting from the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) during the Fe(III) reduction phase in acetate-amended sediments. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences in the sediments in which U(VI) was being adsorbed indicated that members of the Firmicutes were the predominant organisms whereas no Firmicutes sequences were detected in background sediments which did not have the capacity to sorb U(VI), suggesting that the U(VI) adsorption might be due to the presence of these living organisms or at least their intact cell components. This unexpected enhanced adsorption of U(VI) onto sediments following the stimulation of microbial growth in the subsurface may potentially enhance the cost effectiveness of in situ uranium bioremediation.},
	keywords = {Acetates, Adsorption, Bacteria, Colorado, Geologic Sediments, Oxidation-Reduction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sulfates, Uranium, Water Pollutants, Radioactive, Water Supply},
	issn = {0013-936X},
	author = {N{\textquoteright}guessan, Lucie A and Vrionis, Helen A and Resch, Charles T and Long, Philip E and Lovley, Derek R}
}
