@article {3141, title = {When is a microbial culture "pure"? Persistent cryptic contaminant escapes detection even with deep genome sequencing.}, journal = {mBio}, volume = {4}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Mar 12}, pages = {e00591-12}, abstract = {

UNLABELLED: Geobacter sulfurreducens strain KN400 was recovered in previous studies in which a culture of the DL1 strain of G. sulfurreducens served as the inoculum in investigations of microbial current production at low anode potentials (-400 mV versus Ag/AgCl). Differences in the genome sequences of KN400 and DL1 were too great to have arisen from adaptive evolution during growth on the anode. Previous deep sequencing (80-fold coverage) of the DL1 culture failed to detect sequences specific to KN400, suggesting that KN400 was an external contaminant inadvertently introduced into the anode culturing system. In order to evaluate this further, a portion of the gene for OmcS, a c-type cytochrome that both KN400 and DL1 possess, was amplified from the DL1 culture. HiSeq-2000 Illumina sequencing of the PCR product detected the KN400 sequence, which differs from the DL1 sequence at 14 bp, at a frequency of ca. 1 in 10(5) copies of the DL1 sequence. A similar low frequency of KN400 was detected with quantitative PCR of a KN400-specific gene. KN400 persisted at this frequency after intensive restreaking of isolated colonies from the DL1 culture. However, a culture in which KN400 could no longer be detected was obtained by serial dilution to extinction in liquid medium. The KN400-free culture could not grow on an anode poised at -400 mV. Thus, KN400 cryptically persisted in the culture dominated by DL1 for more than a decade, undetected by even deep whole-genome sequencing, and was only fortuitously uncovered by the unnatural selection pressure of growth on a low-potential electrode.

IMPORTANCE: Repeated streaking of isolated colonies on solidified medium remains a common strategy for obtaining pure cultures, especially of difficult-to-cultivate microorganisms such as strict anaerobes. The results presented here demonstrate that verifying the purity of cultures obtained in this manner may be difficult because extremely rare variants can persist, undetectable with even deep genomic DNA sequencing. The only way to ensure that a culture is pure is to cultivate it from an initial single cell, which may be technically difficult for many environmentally significant microbes.

}, keywords = {Coinfection, Electrodes, Genes, Bacterial, Genotype, Geobacter, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Microbial Interactions, Polymerase Chain Reaction}, issn = {2150-7511}, doi = {10.1128/mBio.00591-12}, author = {Shrestha, Pravin Malla and Nevin, Kelly P and Shrestha, Minita and Lovley, Derek R} } @article {484, title = {Geobacter uraniireducens sp. nov., isolated from subsurface sediment undergoing uranium bioremediation.}, journal = {Int J Syst Evol Microbiol}, volume = {58}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 May}, pages = {1075-8}, abstract = {A Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile bacterium, strain Rf4T, which conserves energy from dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction concomitant with acetate oxidation, was isolated from subsurface sediment undergoing uranium bioremediation. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Rf4T matched sequences recovered in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries constructed from DNA extracted from groundwater sampled at the same time as the source sediment. Cells of strain Rf4T were regular, motile rods, 1.2-2.0 microm long and 0.5-0.6 microm in diameter, with rounded ends. Cells had one lateral flagellum. Growth was optimal at pH 6.5-7.0 and 32 degrees C. With acetate as the electron donor, strain Rf4T used Fe(III), Mn(IV), anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate, malate and fumarate as electron acceptors and reduced U(VI) in cell suspensions. With poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide as the electron acceptor, strain Rf4T oxidized the following electron donors: acetate, lactate, pyruvate and ethanol. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Rf4T placed it in the genus Geobacter. Strain Rf4T was most closely related to {\textquoteright}Geobacter humireducens{\textquoteright} JW3 (95.9 \% sequence similarity), Geobacter bremensis Dfr1T (95.4 \%) and Geobacter bemidjiensis BemT (95.1 \%). Based on phylogenetic analysis and phenotypic differences between strain Rf4T and closely related Geobacter species, this strain is described as a representative of a novel species, Geobacter uraniireducens sp. nov. The type strain is Rf4T (=ATCC BAA-1134T =JCM 13001T).}, keywords = {Bacterial Typing Techniques, DNA, Bacterial, Genes, rRNA, Genotype, Geobacter, Geologic Sediments, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxidation-Reduction, Phenotype, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Species Specificity, Uranium}, issn = {1466-5026}, doi = {10.1099/ijs.0.65377-0}, author = {Shelobolina, Evgenya S and Vrionis, Helen A and Findlay, Robert H and Lovley, Derek R} }