@article {3048,
	title = {Microbial biofilms for electricity generation from water evaporation and power to wearables.},
	journal = {Nat Commun},
	volume = {13},
	year = {2022},
	month = {2022 Jul 28},
	pages = {4369},
	abstract = {<p>Employing renewable materials for fabricating clean energy harvesting devices can further improve sustainability. Microorganisms can be mass produced with renewable feedstocks. Here, we demonstrate that it is possible to engineer microbial biofilms as a cohesive, flexible material for long-term continuous electricity production from evaporating water. Single biofilm sheet (~40 {\textmu}m thick) serving as the functional component in an electronic device continuously produces power density (~1 μW/cm) higher than that achieved with thicker engineered materials. The energy output is comparable to that achieved with similar sized biofilms catalyzing current production in microbial fuel cells, without the need for an organic feedstock or maintaining cell viability. The biofilm can be sandwiched between a pair of mesh electrodes for scalable device integration and current production. The devices maintain the energy production in ionic solutions and can be used as skin-patch devices to harvest electricity from sweat and moisture on skin to continuously power wearable devices. Biofilms made from different microbial species show generic current production from water evaporation. These results suggest that we can harness the ubiquity of biofilms in nature as additional sources of biomaterial for evaporation-based electricity generation in diverse aqueous environments.</p>},
	keywords = {Bioelectric Energy Sources, Biofilms, Electricity, Electrodes, Water, Wearable Electronic Devices},
	issn = {2041-1723},
	doi = {10.1038/s41467-022-32105-6},
	author = {Liu, Xiaomeng and Ueki, Toshiyuki and Gao, Hongyan and Woodard, Trevor L and Nevin, Kelly P and Fu, Tianda and Fu, Shuai and Sun, Lu and Lovley, Derek R and Yao, Jun}
}
@article {404,
	title = {Interspecies electron transfer via hydrogen and formate rather than direct electrical connections in cocultures of Pelobacter carbinolicus and Geobacter sulfurreducens.},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {78},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Nov},
	pages = {7645-51},
	abstract = {<p>Direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) is an alternative to interspecies H(2)/formate transfer as a mechanism for microbial species to cooperatively exchange electrons during syntrophic metabolism. To understand what specific properties contribute to DIET, studies were conducted with Pelobacter carbinolicus, a close relative of Geobacter metallireducens, which is capable of DIET. P. carbinolicus grew in coculture with Geobacter sulfurreducens with ethanol as the electron donor and fumarate as the electron acceptor, conditions under which G. sulfurreducens formed direct electrical connections with G. metallireducens. In contrast to the cell aggregation associated with DIET, P. carbinolicus and G. sulfurreducens did not aggregate. Attempts to initiate cocultures with a genetically modified strain of G. sulfurreducens incapable of both H(2) and formate utilization were unsuccessful, whereas cocultures readily grew with mutant strains capable of formate but not H(2) uptake or vice versa. The hydrogenase mutant of G. sulfurreducens compensated, in cocultures, with significantly increased formate dehydrogenase gene expression. In contrast, the transcript abundance of a hydrogenase gene was comparable in cocultures with that for the formate dehydrogenase mutant of G. sulfurreducens or the wild type, suggesting that H(2) was the primary electron carrier in the wild-type cocultures. Cocultures were also initiated with strains of G. sulfurreducens that could not produce pili or OmcS, two essential components for DIET. The finding that P. carbinolicus exchanged electrons with G. sulfurreducens via interspecies transfer of H(2)/formate rather than DIET demonstrates that not all microorganisms that can grow syntrophically are capable of DIET and that closely related microorganisms may use significantly different strategies for interspecies electron exchange.</p>},
	keywords = {Coculture Techniques, Deltaproteobacteria, Electricity, Electron Transport, Electrons, Formates, Geobacter, Hydrogen, Microbial Interactions},
	issn = {1098-5336},
	doi = {10.1128/AEM.01946-12},
	author = {Rotaru, Amelia-Elena and Shrestha, Pravin M and Liu, Fanghua and Ueki, Toshiyuki and Nevin, Kelly and Summers, Zarath M and Lovley, Derek R}
}
