@article {393,
	title = {Two functions of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Rob: mediating "sequestration-dispersal" as a novel off-on switch for regulating Rob{\textquoteright}s activity as a transcription activator and preventing degradation of Rob by Lon protease.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {388},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 May 8},
	pages = {415-30},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, Rob activates transcription of the SoxRS/MarA/Rob regulon. Previous work revealed that Rob resides in three to four immunostainable foci, that dipyridyl and bile salts are inducers of its activity, and that inducers bind to Rob{\textquoteright}s C-terminal domain (CTD). We propose that sequestration inactivates Rob by blocking its access to the transcriptional machinery and that inducers activate Rob by mediating its dispersal, allowing interaction with RNA polymerase. To test "sequestration-dispersal" as a new mechanism for regulating the activity of transcriptional activators, we fused Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD to SoxS and used indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to determine the effect of inducers on SoxS-Rob{\textquoteright}s cellular localization. Unlike native SoxS, which is uniformly distributed throughout the cell, SoxS-Rob is sequestered without an inducer, but is rapidly dispersed when cells are treated with an inducer. In this manner, Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD serves as an anti-sigma factor in regulating the co-sigma-factor-like activity of SoxS when fused to it. Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD also protects its N-terminus from Lon protease, since Lon{\textquoteright}s normally rapid degradation of SoxS is blocked in the chimera. Accordingly, Rob{\textquoteright}s CTD has novel regulatory properties that can be bestowed on another E. coli protein.},
	keywords = {Decanoic Acids, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Reporter, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Protease La, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Pyridines, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Trans-Activators, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {1089-8638},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2009.03.023},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Fitzpatrick, M Megan and Keen, Edward F and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {395,
	title = {A degenerate tripartite DNA-binding site required for activation of ComA-dependent quorum response gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {381},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Aug 29},
	pages = {261-75},
	abstract = {In Bacillus subtilis, the transcription factor ComA activates several biological processes in response to increasing population density. Extracellular peptide signaling is used to coordinate the activity of ComA with population density. At low culture densities, when the concentration of signaling peptides is lowest, ComA is largely inactive. At higher densities, when the concentration of signaling peptides is higher, ComA is active and activates the transcription of at least nine operons involved in the development of competence and in the production of degradative enzymes and antibiotics. We found that ComA binds a degenerate tripartite sequence consisting of three DNA-binding determinants or "recognition elements." Mutational analyses showed that all three recognition elements are required for transcription activation in vivo and for specific DNA binding by ComA in vitro. Degeneracy of the recognition elements in the ComA-binding site is an important regulatory feature for coordinating transcription with population density (i.e., promoters containing an optimized binding site have high activity at low culture density and are no longer regulated in the normal-density-dependent manner). We found that purified ComA forms a dimer in solution, and we propose a model for how two dimers of ComA bind to an odd number of DNA-binding determinants to activate transcription of target genes. This DNA-protein architecture for transcription activation appears to be conserved for ComA homologs in other Bacillus species.},
	keywords = {Bacillus subtilis, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Dimerization, DNA, Bacterial, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Peptide Synthases, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Quorum Sensing, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription, Genetic, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {1089-8638},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.035},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Grossman, Alan D}
}
@article {394,
	title = {Inducible protein degradation in Bacillus subtilis using heterologous peptide tags and adaptor proteins to target substrates to the protease ClpXP.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {70},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008 Nov},
	pages = {1012-25},
	abstract = {The ability to manipulate protein levels is useful for dissecting regulatory pathways, elucidating gene function and constructing synthetic biological circuits. We engineered an inducible protein degradation system for use in Bacillus subtilis based on Escherichia coli and Caulobacter crescentusssrA tags and SspB adaptors that deliver proteins to ClpXP for proteolysis. In this system, modified ssrA degradation tags are fused onto the 3{\textquoteright} end of the genes of interest. Unlike wild-type ssrA, these modified tags require the adaptor protein SspB to target tagged proteins for proteolysis. In the absence of SspB, the tagged proteins accumulate to near physiological levels. By inducing SspB expression from a regulated promoter, the tagged substrates are rapidly delivered to the B. subtilis ClpXP protease for degradation. We used this system to degrade the reporter GFP and several native B. subtilis proteins, including, the transcription factor ComA, two sporulation kinases (KinA, KinB) and the sporulation and chromosome partitioning protein Spo0J. We also used modified E. coli and C. crescentus ssrA tags to independently control the degradation of two different proteins in the same cell. These tools will be useful for studying biological processes in B. subtilis and can potentially be modified for use in other bacteria.},
	keywords = {Alleles, Bacillus subtilis, Bacterial Proteins, Carrier Proteins, Caulobacter crescentus, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endopeptidase Clp, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genetic Vectors, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Plasmids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Engineering, RNA, Bacterial, Substrate Specificity},
	issn = {1365-2958},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06467.x},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Grossman, Alan D}
}
@article {396,
	title = {Characterization of TetD as a transcriptional activator of a subset of genes of the Escherichia coli SoxS/MarA/Rob regulon.},
	journal = {Mol Microbiol},
	volume = {56},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005 May},
	pages = {1103-17},
	abstract = {In Escherichia coli, SoxS, MarA and Rob form a closely related subset of the AraC/XylS family of positive regulators, sharing approximately 42\% amino acid sequence identity over the length of SoxS and the ability to activate transcription of a common set of target genes that provide resistance to redox-cycling compounds and antibiotics. On the basis of its approximately 43\% amino acid sequence identity with SoxS, MarA and Rob, TetD, encoded by transposon Tn10, appears to be a fourth member of the subset. However, although its expression has been shown to be negatively regulated by TetC and not inducible by tetracycline, the physiological function of TetD is unknown. Accordingly, in the work presented here, we initiate a molecular characterization of TetD. We show that expression of TetD activates transcription of a subset of the SoxS/MarA/Rob regulon genes and confers resistance to redox-cycling compounds and antibiotics. We show that mutations in the putative TetD binding site of a TetD-activatable promoter and a mutation in the protein{\textquoteright}s N-terminal DNA recognition helix interfere with transcription activation, thereby indicating that TetD directly activates target gene transcription. Finally, we show that TetD, like SoxS and MarA, is intrinsically unstable; however, unlike SoxS and MarA, TetD is not degraded by Lon or any of the cell{\textquoteright}s known cytoplasmic ATP-dependent proteases. Thus, we conclude that TetD is a bona fide member of the SoxS/MarA/Rob subfamily of positive regulators.},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Multigene Family, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regulon, Tetracycline Resistance, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic},
	issn = {0950-382X},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04599.x},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Becker, Stephen M and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {397,
	title = {Genetic evidence for pre-recruitment as the mechanism of transcription activation by SoxS of Escherichia coli: the dominance of DNA binding mutations of SoxS.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {344},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004 Nov 12},
	pages = {1-10},
	abstract = {SoxS, the direct transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli superoxide (SoxRS) regulon, displays several unusual characteristics which suggest that it is unlikely to activate transcription by the ususal recruitment mechanism. Thus, agents that generate superoxide endogenously and thereby provoke the defense response elicit the de novo synthesis of SoxS, and with the SoxS binding site being highly degenerate, the number of SoxS binding sites per cell far exceeds the number of SoxS molecules per cell. To account for these distinctive features of the SoxRS system, we proposed "pre-recruitment" as the mechanism by which SoxS activates transcription of the regulon{\textquoteright}s genes. In pre-recruitment, newly synthesized SoxS molecules form binary complexes with RNA polymerase in solution. These complexes provide the information content to allow the 2500 molecules of SoxS per cell to scan the 65,000 SoxS binding sites per cell for the 200 binding sites per cell that reside within SoxS-dependent promoters. As a test of whether SoxS activates transcription by recruitment or pre-recruitment, we determined the dominance relationships of SoxS mutations conferring defective DNA binding. We found that soxS DNA binding mutations are dominant to the wild-type allele, a result consistent with the pre-recruitment hypothesis, but opposite to that expected for an activator that functions by recruitment. Moreover, whereas positive control mutations of activators functioning by recruitment are usually dominant, a soxS positive control mutation was not. Lastly, with the SoxRS system as an example, we discuss the physiological requirement for stringent regulation of transcriptional activators that function by pre-recruitment.},
	keywords = {Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Bacterial, Genes, Dominant, Mutation, Regulon, Trans-Activators, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0022-2836},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.007},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {399,
	title = {A comprehensive alanine scanning mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli transcriptional activator SoxS: identifying amino acids important for DNA binding and transcription activation.},
	journal = {J Mol Biol},
	volume = {322},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Sep 13},
	pages = {237-57},
	abstract = {SoxS is the direct transcriptional activator of the superoxide regulon. SoxS recognizes a highly degenerate "soxbox" DNA sequence, and activates transcription from class I and class II promoters. SoxS is the smallest member of the AraC/XylS family of transcription regulators whose hallmark is dual helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motifs. Evidence suggests that the N-terminal HTH motif of SoxS interacts with a highly conserved region of the soxbox termed recognition element 1 (RE1), while the C-terminal HTH motif interacts with the less conserved recognition element 2 (RE2). In the work described here, we prepared a complete library of 101 SoxS mutants containing single alanine substitutions of SoxS, and we characterized the mutant proteins in vivo and in vitro. With SoxS being closely related to MarA, we analyzed the effects of the SoxS mutations in the context of the MarA-mar crystal structure and with respect to the NMR study of MarA-DNA complexes in solution. From the properties of the alanine substitutions, we conclude the following. (1) Surface-exposed residues of helix 3 and helix 6, the recognition helices of the dual HTH motifs, are important to DNA binding and transcription activation; however, substitutions of residues predicted from the MarA-mar crystal structure to make contact with the sugar-phosphate backbone are more detrimental to DNA binding than mutations predicted to make base-specific contacts. (2) Substitution of several residues within the recognition helix predicted to make base-specific contacts with RE2 have relatively little effect on DNA-binding, suggesting the possibility of alternative protein-DNA interactions than those inferred from the MarA-mar crystal structure. (3) DNA binding and transcription activation were reduced by substitution of conserved amino acid residues comprising the hydrophobic core, presumably because they disrupt the structural integrity of SoxS. (4) Mutant K30A appears to be a positive control mutant defective in a protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase that is required for transcription activation at all SoxS-dependent promoters because it binds and bends DNA normally but fails to activate transcription from both classes of promoters. Alanine substitutions of surface-exposed residues H3, K5, D9, S31, and V45 confer a similar phenotype. Since these residues are near K30 on the surface of the protein, the surface formed by the six residues may be used to make protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase that are required for transcription activation at both class I and class II SoxS-dependent promoters. (5) Mutants F74A, D75A, M78A, D79A and Q85A appear to define a surface required for protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase specifically at class II promoters because these positive control mutants bind and bend DNA normally but are defective in activation of class II promoters but not class I promoters. These SoxS mutants that bind and bend DNA normally but are defective in transcription activation represent the first positive control mutants with putative defects in protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase among the SoxS/MarA/Rob subset of the AraC/XylS family of transcription regulators.},
	keywords = {Alanine, Amino Acid Substitution, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genes, Lethal, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lac Operon, Models, Molecular, Mutagenesis, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phenotype, Phosphates, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Structure-Activity Relationship, Trans-Activators, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0022-2836},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Wolf, Richard E}
}
@article {400,
	title = {Evidence for "pre-recruitment" as a new mechanism of transcription activation in Escherichia coli: the large excess of SoxS binding sites per cell relative to the number of SoxS molecules per cell.},
	journal = {Biochem Biophys Res Commun},
	volume = {291},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002 Mar 8},
	pages = {979-86},
	abstract = {In response to the oxidative stress imposed by redox-cycling compounds like paraquat, Escherichia coli induces the synthesis of SoxS, which then activates the transcription of approximately 100 genes. The DNA binding site for SoxS-dependent transcription activation, the "soxbox," is highly degenerate, suggesting that the genome contains a large number of SoxS binding sites. To estimate the number of soxboxes in the cell, we searched the E. coli genome for SoxS binding sites using as query sequence the previously determined optimal SoxS binding sequence. We found approximately 12,500 sequences that match the optimal binding sequence under the conditions of our search; this agrees with our previous estimate, based on information theory, that a random sequence the size of the E. coli genome contains approximately 13,000 soxboxes. Thus, fast-growing cells with 4-6 genomes per cell have approximately 65,000 soxboxes. This large number of potential SoxS binding sites per cell raises the interesting question of how SoxS distinguishes between the functional soxboxes located within the promoters of target genes and the plethora of equivalent but nonfunctional binding sites scattered throughout the chromosome. To address this question, we treated cells with paraquat and used Western blot analysis to determine the kinetics of SoxS accumulation per cell; we also determined the kinetics of SoxS-activated gene expression. The abundance of SoxS reached a maximum of 2,500 molecules per cell 20 min after induction and gradually declined to approximately 500 molecules per cell over the next 1.5 h. Given that activation of target gene expression began almost immediately and given the large disparity between the number of SoxS molecules per cell, 2,500, and the number of SoxS binding sites per cell, 65,000, we infer that SoxS is not likely to activate transcription by the usual "recruitment" pathway, as this mechanism would require a number of SoxS molecules similar to the number of soxboxes. Instead, we propose that SoxS first interacts in solution with RNA polymerase and then the binary complex scans the chromosome for promoters that contain a soxbox properly positioned and oriented for transcription activation. We name this new pathway "pre-recruitment."},
	keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Binding Sites, Blotting, Western, Cell Division, DNA-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Kinetics, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Oxidative Stress, Paraquat, Protein Transport, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation},
	issn = {0006-291X},
	doi = {10.1006/bbrc.2002.6559},
	author = {Griffith, Kevin L and Shah, Ishita M and Myers, Todd E and O{\textquoteright}Neill, Michael C and Wolf, Richard E}
}
